Table of Contents

 
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.  20549
 
FORM 10-Q
 
(Mark One)
 
x	Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2009	
 	 	
or	
 	 	
o	Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for the transition period from                               to                                	
 
Commission File Number: 1-6887
 
BANK OF HAWAII CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
 
Delaware	 	99-0148992	
(State of incorporation)	 	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)	
 	 	 	
130 Merchant Street, Honolulu, Hawaii	 	96813	
(Address of principal executive offices)	 	(Zip Code)	
 
1-888-643-3888
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yesx   Noo
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (Section 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yeso   Noo
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.  See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
 
Large accelerated filerx	Accelerated filero	
Non-accelerated filero (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)	Smaller reporting companyo	
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yeso   Nox
 
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
 
As of October 21, 2009, there were 47,938,676 shares of common stock outstanding.

 

Table of Contents
 
Bank of Hawaii Corporation
Form 10-Q
Index
 
 	 	Page	
 	 	 	
Part I - Financial Information	 	
 	 	 	
Item 1.	Financial Statements (Unaudited)	 	
 	 	 	
 	Consolidated Statements of Income – Three and nine months ended
September 30, 2009 and 2008	2	
 	 	 	
 	Consolidated Statements of Condition – September 30, 2009,
December 31, 2008, and September 30, 2008	3	
 	 	 	
 	Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity – Nine months ended
September 30, 2009 and 2008	4	
 	 	 	
 	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows – Nine months ended
September 30, 2009 and 2008	5	
 	 	 	
 	Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)	6	
 	 	 	
Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations	23	
 	 	 	
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	52	
 	 	 	
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	52	
 	 	 	
Part II - Other Information	 	
 	 	 	
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	52	
 	 	 	
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	52	
 	 	 	
Item 6.	Exhibits	52	
 	 	 	
Signatures	53	
 
1

Table of Contents
 
Bank of Hawaii Corporation and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Income (Unaudited)
 	 	 	Three Months Ended	 	 	Nine Months Ended	 	
 	 	 	September 30,	 	 	September 30,	 	
(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)	 	2009	 	2008	 	2009	 	2008	 	
Interest Income	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Interest and Fees on Loans and Leases	 	$	79,530	 	$	92,744	 	$	249,464	 	$	295,116	 	
Income on Investment Securities	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Trading	 	—	 	1,174	 	594	 	3,543	 	
Available-for-Sale	 	46,419	 	35,152	 	116,875	 	104,724	 	
Held-to-Maturity	 	2,179	 	2,870	 	7,115	 	9,142	 	
Deposits	 	3	 	33	 	18	 	432	 	
Funds Sold	 	320	 	141	 	1,423	 	1,553	 	
Other	 	277	 	490	 	829	 	1,405	 	
Total Interest Income	 	128,728	 	132,604	 	376,318	 	415,915	 	
Interest Expense	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Deposits	 	12,235	 	17,736	 	43,741	 	65,439	 	
Securities Sold Under Agreements to Repurchase	 	6,394	 	7,675	 	19,523	 	25,780	 	
Funds Purchased	 	5	 	507	 	15	 	1,410	 	
Short-Term Borrowings	 	—	 	13	 	—	 	59	 	
Long-Term Debt	 	1,207	 	3,098	 	4,239	 	10,304	 	
Total Interest Expense	 	19,841	 	29,029	 	67,518	 	102,992	 	
Net Interest Income	 	108,887	 	103,575	 	308,800	 	312,923	 	
Provision for Credit Losses	 	27,500	 	20,358	 	81,077	 	41,957	 	
Net Interest Income After Provision for Credit Losses	 	81,387	 	83,217	 	227,723	 	270,966	 	
Noninterest Income	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Trust and Asset Management	 	10,915	 	14,193	 	34,428	 	44,739	 	
Mortgage Banking	 	4,656	 	621	 	18,777	 	7,656	 	
Service Charges on Deposit Accounts	 	14,014	 	13,045	 	40,310	 	37,539	 	
Fees, Exchange, and Other Service Charges	 	14,801	 	15,604	 	45,187	 	47,098	 	
Investment Securities Gains (Losses), Net	 	(5	)	159	 	63	 	446	 	
Insurance	 	7,304	 	5,902	 	17,689	 	18,622	 	
Other	 	5,115	 	7,462	 	30,543	 	47,550	 	
Total Noninterest Income	 	56,800	 	56,986	 	186,997	 	203,650	 	
Noninterest Expense	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Salaries and Benefits	 	46,387	 	46,764	 	137,595	 	148,221	 	
Net Occupancy	 	10,350	 	11,795	 	30,686	 	33,581	 	
Net Equipment	 	4,502	 	4,775	 	13,320	 	13,570	 	
Professional Fees	 	2,642	 	3,270	 	9,196	 	8,471	 	
FDIC Insurance	 	3,290	 	321	 	14,091	 	817	 	
Other	 	16,816	 	19,865	 	56,616	 	59,424	 	
Total Noninterest Expense	 	83,987	 	86,790	 	261,504	 	264,084	 	
Income Before Provision for Income Taxes	 	54,200	 	53,413	 	153,216	 	210,532	 	
Provision for Income Taxes	 	17,729	 	6,004	 	49,699	 	57,626	 	
Net Income	 	$	36,471	 	$	47,409	 	$	103,517	 	$	152,906	 	
Basic Earnings Per Share	 	$	0.76	 	$	1.00	 	$	2.17	 	$	3.20	 	
Diluted Earnings Per Share	 	$	0.76	 	$	0.99	 	$	2.16	 	$	3.17	 	
Dividends Declared Per Share	 	$	0.45	 	$	0.44	 	$	1.35	 	$	1.32	 	
Basic Weighted Average Shares	 	47,745,375	 	47,518,078	 	47,665,146	 	47,738,245	 	
Diluted Weighted Average Shares	 	48,045,873	 	48,057,965	 	47,930,271	 	48,295,901	 	

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited).
 
2

Table of Contents
 
Bank of Hawaii Corporation and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Condition (Unaudited)
 	 	September 30,	 	December 31,	 	September 30,	 	
(dollars in thousands)	 	2009	 	2008	 	2008	 	
Assets	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Interest-Bearing Deposits	 	$	5,863	 	$	5,094	 	$	13,845	 	
Funds Sold	 	401,200	 	405,789	 	—	 	
Investment Securities	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Trading	 	—	 	91,500	 	90,993	 	
Available-for-Sale	 	4,827,588	 	2,519,239	 	2,572,111	 	
Held-to-Maturity (Fair Value of $201,118; $242,175; and $245,720)	 	194,444	 	239,635	 	249,083	 	
Loans Held for Sale	 	19,346	 	21,540	 	14,903	 	
Loans and Leases	 	5,931,358	 	6,530,233	 	6,539,458	 	
Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses	 	(142,658	)	(123,498	)	(115,498	)	
Net Loans and Leases	 	5,788,700	 	6,406,735	 	6,423,960	 	
Total Earning Assets	 	11,237,141	 	9,689,532	 	9,364,895	 	
Cash and Noninterest-Bearing Deposits	 	291,480	 	385,599	 	285,762	 	
Premises and Equipment	 	110,173	 	116,120	 	118,333	 	
Customers’ Acceptances	 	950	 	1,308	 	1,250	 	
Accrued Interest Receivable	 	43,047	 	39,905	 	41,061	 	
Foreclosed Real Estate	 	201	 	428	 	293	 	
Mortgage Servicing Rights	 	25,437	 	21,057	 	27,707	 	
Goodwill	 	34,959	 	34,959	 	34,959	 	
Other Assets	 	464,637	 	474,567	 	460,787	 	
Total Assets	 	$	12,208,025	 	$	10,763,475	 	$	10,335,047	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Liabilities	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Deposits	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Noninterest-Bearing Demand	 	$	2,055,872	 	$	1,754,724	 	$	1,592,251	 	
Interest-Bearing Demand	 	1,588,705	 	1,854,611	 	1,708,183	 	
Savings	 	4,365,257	 	3,104,863	 	2,780,798	 	
Time	 	1,240,266	 	1,577,900	 	1,577,252	 	
Total Deposits	 	9,250,100	 	8,292,098	 	7,658,484	 	
Funds Purchased	 	8,670	 	15,734	 	189,700	 	
Short-Term Borrowings	 	7,200	 	4,900	 	10,621	 	
Securities Sold Under Agreements to Repurchase	 	1,524,755	 	1,028,835	 	1,109,431	 	
Long-Term Debt (includes $119,275 and $120,598 carried at fair value
as of December 31, 2008 and September 30, 2008, respectively)	 	91,424	 	203,285	 	204,616	 	
Banker’s Acceptances	 	950	 	1,308	 	1,250	 	
Retirement Benefits Payable	 	43,918	 	54,776	 	22,438	 	
Accrued Interest Payable	 	9,740	 	13,837	 	12,702	 	
Taxes Payable and Deferred Taxes	 	254,375	 	229,699	 	240,795	 	
Other Liabilities	 	114,094	 	128,299	 	104,990	 	
Total Liabilities	 	11,305,226	 	9,972,771	 	9,555,027	 	
Shareholders’ Equity	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Common Stock ($.01 par value; authorized 500,000,000 shares;
issued / outstanding: September 30, 2009 - 57,028,554 / 47,937,543;
December 31, 2008 - 57,019,887 / 47,753,371;
and September 30, 2008 - 57,022,797 / 47,707,629)	 	569	 	568	 	568	 	
Capital Surplus	 	492,346	 	492,515	 	491,419	 	
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)	 	37,307	 	(28,888	)	(18,643	)	
Retained Earnings	 	825,709	 	787,924	 	770,373	 	
Treasury Stock, at Cost (Shares: September 30, 2009 - 9,091,011;
December 31, 2008 - 9,266,516; and September 30, 2008 - 9,315,168)	 	(453,132	)	(461,415	)	(463,697	)	
Total Shareholders’ Equity	 	902,799	 	790,704	 	780,020	 	
Total Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity	 	$	12,208,025	 	$	10,763,475	 	$	10,335,047	 	
 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited).
 
3

Table of Contents
 
Bank of Hawaii Corporation and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity (Unaudited)
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	Accum.	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	Other	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	Compre-	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	hensive	 	 	 	 	 	 	Compre-	 	
 	 	 	 	Common	 	Capital	 	Income	 	Retained	 	Treasury	 	 	hensive	 	
(dollars in thousands)	 	Total	 	Stock	 	Surplus	 	(Loss)	 	Earnings	 	Stock	 	 	Income	 	
Balance as of December 31, 2008	 	$	790,704	 	$	568	 	$	492,515	 	$	(28,888	)	$	787,924	 	$	(461,415	)	 	 	 	
Comprehensive Income:	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Net Income	 	103,517	 	—	 	—	 	—	 	103,517	 	—	 	 	$	103,517	 	
Other Comprehensive Income, Net of Tax:	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Change in Unrealized Gains and Losses
on Investment Securities Available-for-Sale	 	65,121	 	—	 	—	 	65,121	 	—	 	—	 	 	65,121	 	
Amortization of Net Loss Related to Pension and Postretirement Benefit Plans	 	1,074	 	—	 	—	 	1,074	 	—	 	—	 	 	1,074	 	
Total Comprehensive Income	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	$	169,712	 	
Share-Based Compensation	 	1,700	 	—	 	1,700	 	—	 	—	 	—	 	 	 	 	
Common Stock Issued under Purchase and Equity Compensation Plans and Related Tax Benefits (209,847 shares)	 	6,202	 	1	 	(1,869	)	—	 	(1,101	)	9,171	 	 	 	 	
Common Stock Repurchased (25,675 shares)	 	(888	)	—	 	—	 	—	 	—	 	(888	)	 	 	 	
Cash Dividends Paid	 	(64,631	)	—	 	—	 	—	 	(64,631	)	—	 	 	 	 	
Balance as of September 30, 2009	 	$	902,799	 	$	569	 	$	492,346	 	$	37,307	 	$	825,709	 	$	(453,132	)	 	 	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Balance as of December 31, 2007	 	$	750,255	 	$	567	 	$	484,790	 	$	(5,091	)	$	688,638	 	$	(418,649	)	 	 	 	
Cumulative-Effect Adjustment of a Change in Accounting Principle, Net of Tax:	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Adoption of Accounting Standards Related to the Fair Value Option	 	(2,736	)	—	 	—	 	—	 	(2,736	)	—	 	 	 	 	
Comprehensive Income:	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Net Income	 	152,906	 	—	 	—	 	—	 	152,906	 	—	 	 	$	152,906	 	
Other Comprehensive Income, Net of Tax:	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Change in Unrealized Gains and Losses
on Investment Securities Available-for-Sale	 	(13,699	)	—	 	—	 	(13,699	)	—	 	—	 	 	(13,699	)	
Amortization of Net Loss Related to Pension and Postretirement Benefit Plans	 	147	 	—	 	—	 	147	 	—	 	—	 	 	147	 	
Total Comprehensive Income	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	$	139,354	 	
Share-Based Compensation	 	4,480	 	—	 	4,480	 	—	 	—	 	—	 	 	 	 	
Common Stock Issued under Purchase and Equity Compensation Plans and Related Tax Benefits (378,382 shares)	 	13,728	 	1	 	2,149	 	—	 	(5,075	)	16,653	 	 	 	 	
Common Stock Repurchased (1,260,398 shares)	 	(61,701	)	—	 	—	 	—	 	—	 	(61,701	)	 	 	 	
Cash Dividends Paid	 	(63,360	)	—	 	—	 	—	 	(63,360	)	—	 	 	 	 	
Balance as of September 30, 2008	 	$	780,020	 	$	568	 	$	491,419	 	$	(18,643	)	$	770,373	 	$	(463,697	)	 	 	 	
 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited).
 
4

Table of Contents
 
Bank of Hawaii Corporation and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)
 	 	 	Nine Months Ended	 	
 	 	 	September 30,	 	
(dollars in thousands)	 	2009	 	2008	 	
Operating Activities	 	 	 	 	 	
Net Income	 	$	103,517	 	$	152,906	 	
Adjustments to Reconcile Net Income to Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities:	 	 	 	 	 	
Provision for Credit Losses	 	81,077	 	41,957	 	
Depreciation and Amortization	 	10,130	 	10,878	 	
Amortization of Deferred Loan and Lease Fees	 	(1,754	)	(1,563	)	
Amortization and Accretion of Premiums/Discounts on Investment Securities, Net	 	4,920	 	1,117	 	
Share-Based Compensation	 	1,700	 	4,480	 	
Benefit Plan Contributions	 	(12,302	)	(8,403	)	
Deferred Income Taxes	 	(21,235	)	(32,559	)	
Gain on Sale of Insurance Business	 	(742	)	—	 	
Net Gains on Investment Securities	 	(63	)	(446	)	
Net Change in Trading Securities	 	91,500	 	(23,707	)	
Proceeds from Sales of Loans Held for Sale	 	902,169	 	340,955	 	
Originations of Loans Held for Sale	 	(863,849	)	(343,517	)	
Tax Benefits from Share-Based Compensation	 	(122	)	(1,813	)	
Net Change in Other Assets and Other Liabilities	 	(5,589	)	(21,944	)	
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities	 	289,357	 	118,341	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	
Investing Activities	 	 	 	 	 	
Investment Securities Available-for-Sale:	 	 	 	 	 	
Proceeds from Prepayments and Maturities	 	1,341,645	 	601,213	 	
Proceeds from Sales	 	169,952	 	233,085	 	
Purchases	 	(3,722,753	)	(864,985	)	
Investment Securities Held-to-Maturity:	 	 	 	 	 	
Proceeds from Prepayments and Maturities	 	44,892	 	43,184	 	
Proceeds from Sale of Insurance Business	 	1,769	 	—	 	
Net Change in Loans and Leases	 	535,023	 	25,509	 	
Premises and Equipment, Net	 	(4,183	)	(12,034	)	
Net Cash Provided by (Used In) Investing Activities	 	(1,633,655	)	25,972	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	
Financing Activities	 	 	 	 	 	
Net Change in Deposits	 	958,002	 	(283,888	)	
Net Change in Short-Term Borrowings	 	491,156	 	194,585	 	
Repayments of Long-Term Debt	 	(143,971	)	(32,425	)	
Tax Benefits from Share-Based Compensation	 	122	 	1,813	 	
Proceeds from Issuance of Common Stock	 	6,569	 	11,998	 	
Repurchase of Common Stock	 	(888	)	(61,701	)	
Cash Dividends Paid	 	(64,631	)	(63,360	)	
Net Cash Provided by (Used In) Financing Activities	 	1,246,359	 	(232,978	)	
 	 	 	 	 	 	
Net Change in Cash and Cash Equivalents	 	(97,939	)	(88,665	)	
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period	 	796,482	 	388,272	 	
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period	 	$	698,543	 	$	299,607	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	
Supplemental Information	 	 	 	 	 	
Cash Paid for:	 	 	 	 	 	
Interest	 	$	71,615	 	$	110,766	 	
Income Taxes	 	56,347	 	75,758	 	
Non-Cash Investing and Financing Activities:	 	 	 	 	 	
Transfers from Loans and Leases to Foreclosed Real Estate	 	92	 	174	 	
Transfers from Loans and Leases to Loans Held for Sale	 	36,126	 	—	 	
Replacement of a Leveraged Lease with a Direct Financing Lease	 	32,437	 	—	 	

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited).
 
5

Table of Contents
 
Bank of Hawaii Corporation and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
 
Note 1.  Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
 
Basis of Presentation
 
Bank of Hawaii Corporation (the “Parent”) is a bank holding company headquartered in Honolulu, Hawaii.  Bank of Hawaii Corporation and its Subsidiaries (the “Company”) provides a broad range of financial products and services to customers in Hawaii and the Pacific Islands (Guam, nearby islands, and American Samoa).  The Parent’s principal subsidiary is Bank of Hawaii (the “Bank”).  All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
 
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements of the Company have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X.  Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and accompanying notes required by GAAP for complete financial statements.  In the opinion of management, the consolidated financial statements reflect normal recurring adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of the results for the interim periods.
 
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts in the financial statements and accompanying notes.  Actual results may differ from those estimates and such differences could be material to the financial statements.
 
Certain prior period information has been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation.
 
These statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and related notes included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.  Operating results for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2009.
 
Investment Securities
 
Realized gains and losses on investment securities are recorded in noninterest income using the specific identification method.
 
Non-Marketable Equity Securities
 
The Company is required to hold non-marketable equity securities, comprised of Federal Home Loan Bank of Seattle (“FHLB”) and Federal Reserve Bank stock, as a condition of membership.  These securities are accounted for at cost which equals par or redemption value.  Ownership is restricted and there is no market for these securities.  These securities are redeemable at par by the issuing government supported institutions.  These securities, recorded as a component of other assets, are periodically evaluated for impairment, considering the ultimate recoverability of the par value.  The primary factor supporting the carrying value is the commitment of the issuer to perform its obligations, including providing credit and other services to the Bank.
 
6

Table of Contents
 
The Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (the “Codification” or “ASC”)
 
In June 2009, the FASB issued an accounting standard which established the Codification to become the single source of authoritative GAAP recognized by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities, with the exception of guidance issued by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) and its staff.  All guidance contained in the Codification carries an equal level of authority.  The Codification is not intended to change GAAP, but rather is expected to simplify accounting research by reorganizing current GAAP into approximately 90 accounting topics.  The Company adopted this accounting standard in preparing the Consolidated Financial Statements for the period ended September 30, 2009.  The adoption of this accounting standard, which was subsequently codified into ASC Topic 105,  “Generally Accepted Accounting Principles,”  had no impact on retained earnings and will have no impact on the Company’s statements of income and condition.
 
Fair Value Measurements
 
In September 2006, the FASB issued an accounting standard related to fair value measurements, which was effective for the Company on January 1, 2008.  This standard defined fair value, established a framework for measuring fair value, and expanded disclosure requirements about fair value measurements.  On January 1, 2008, the Company adopted this accounting standard related to fair value measurements for the Company’s financial assets and financial liabilities.  The Company deferred adoption of this accounting standard related to fair value measurements for the Company’s nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities, except for those items recognized or disclosed at fair value on an annual or more frequently recurring basis, until January 1, 2009.  The adoption of this accounting standard related to fair value measurements for the Company’s nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities had no impact on retained earnings and is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s statements of income and condition.  This accounting standard was subsequently codified into ASC Topic 820,  “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures.”
 
In April 2009, the FASB issued an accounting standard which provided guidance on estimating fair value when the volume and level of activity for an asset or liability have significantly decreased and in identifying transactions that are not orderly.  In such instances, the accounting standard provides that management may determine that further analysis of the transactions or quoted prices is required, and a significant adjustment to the transactions or quoted prices may be necessary to estimate fair value in accordance with GAAP.  The Company adopted this accounting standard on April 1, 2009.  The provisions in this accounting standard were applied prospectively and did not result in significant changes to the Company’s valuation techniques.  Furthermore, the adoption of this accounting standard, which was subsequently codified into ASC Topic 820,  “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures,”  is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s statements of income and condition.
 
In April 2009, the FASB issued an accounting standard related to disclosures about the fair value of financial instruments in interim reporting periods of publicly traded companies that were previously only required to be disclosed in annual financial statements.  The Company adopted this accounting standard in preparing the Consolidated Financial Statements for the period ended June 30, 2009.  As this accounting standard amended only the disclosure requirements about the fair value of financial instruments in interim periods, the adoption had no impact on the Company’s statements of income and condition.  See Note 8 for the disclosures required under this accounting standard, which was subsequently codified into ASC Topic 825, “Financial Instruments.”
 
7

Table of Contents
 
Derivative Financial Instruments
 
In March 2008, the FASB issued an accounting standard related to disclosure requirements for derivative financial instruments and hedging activities.  Expanded qualitative disclosures required under this accounting standard included:  (1) how and why an entity uses derivative financial instruments; (2) how derivative financial instruments and related hedged items are accounted for under GAAP; and (3) how derivative financial instruments and related hedged items affect an entity’s financial position, financial performance, and cash flows.  This accounting standard also required several added quantitative disclosures in financial statements.  The Company adopted this accounting standard in preparing the Consolidated Financial Statements for the period ended March 31, 2009.  As this accounting standard amended only the disclosure requirements for derivative financial instruments and hedged items, the adoption had no impact on the Company’s statements of income and condition.  See Note 7 for the disclosures required under this accounting standard, which was subsequently codified into ASC Topic 815,  “Derivatives and Hedging.”
 
Other-Than-Temporary-Impairments for Debt Securities
 
In April 2009, the FASB issued an accounting standard which amended other-than-temporary impairment (“OTTI”) guidance in GAAP for debt securities by requiring a write-down when fair value is below amortized cost in circumstances where: (1) an entity has the intent to sell a security; (2) it is more likely than not that an entity will be required to sell the security before recovery of its amortized cost basis; or (3) an entity does not expect to recover the entire amortized cost basis of the security.  If an entity intends to sell a security or if it is more likely than not that the entity will be required to sell the security before recovery, an OTTI write-down is recognized in earnings equal to the entire difference between the security’s amortized cost basis and its fair value.  If an entity does not intend to sell the security or it is not more likely than not that it will be required to sell the security before recovery, the OTTI write-down is separated into an amount representing credit loss, which is recognized in earnings, and an amount related to all other factors, which is recognized in other comprehensive income.  This accounting standard does not amend existing recognition and measurement guidance related to OTTI write-downs of equity securities.  This accounting standard also extends disclosure requirements related to debt and equity securities to interim reporting periods.  The Company adopted this accounting standard on April 1, 2009.  The adoption of this accounting standard had no impact on retained earnings and is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s statements of income and condition.  See Note 2 for the disclosures required under this accounting standard, which was subsequently codified into ASC Topic 320,  “Investments — Debt and Equity Securities.”
 
Future Application of Accounting Pronouncements
 
In June 2009, the FASB issued an accounting standard which amends current GAAP related to the accounting for transfers and servicing of financial assets and extinguishments of liabilities, including the removal of the concept of a qualifying special-purpose entity from GAAP.  This new accounting standard also clarifies that a transferor must evaluate whether it has maintained effective control of a financial asset by considering its continuing direct or indirect involvement with the transferred financial asset.  This accounting standard is effective for financial asset transfers occurring after December 31, 2009.  The adoption of this accounting standard will have no impact on the Company’s statements of income and condition.
 
In June 2009, the FASB issued an accounting standard which will require a qualitative rather than a quantitative analysis to determine the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity (“VIE”) for consolidation purposes.  The primary beneficiary of a VIE is the enterprise that has: (1) the power to direct the activities of the VIE that most significantly impact the VIE’s economic performance, and (2) the obligation to absorb losses of the VIE that could potentially be significant to the VIE or the right to receive benefits of the VIE that could potentially be significant to the VIE.  This accounting standard is effective for the Company on January 1, 2010.  The adoption of this accounting standard will have no impact on the Company’s statements of income and condition.
 
8

Table of Contents
 
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) Assessments
 
On September 29, 2009, the FDIC issued a proposal to amend its assessment regulations to require insured depository institutions to prepay their estimated quarterly risk-based assessments for the fourth quarter of 2009, and for all of 2010, 2011, and 2012.  This proposal indicates that depository institutions are to prepay their assessments on December 30, 2009.  Should this proposed rule become final, the Company estimates its prepaid assessment to be approximately $45.7 million.
 
Subsequent Events
 
On October 9, 2009, the Company signed an agreement to sell certain assets of our wholesale insurance business, Triad Insurance Agency, Inc. (“Triad”), to a third party.  The agreement precludes the Bank from competing directly or indirectly with Triad for a period of 5 years after the closing date of the sale.  In connection with this sale, several employees of Triad were hired by the third party.  The sale of Triad closed on October 22, 2009 and resulted in pre-tax gains of approximately $1.5 million.  Net income of Triad for the year ended December 31, 2008 was $4.5 million.
 
Management has considered subsequent events through October 26, 2009, which is the date we issued our financial statements, in preparing the September 30, 2009 Consolidated Financial Statements.
 
9

Table of Contents
 
Note 2.  Investment Securities
 
The amortized cost, gross unrealized gains and losses, and estimated fair value of the Company’s investment securities as of September 30, 2009, December 31, 2008, and September 30, 2008 were as follows:
 
Investment Securities
 	 	 	 	Gross	 	Gross	 	 	 	
 	 	Amortized	 	Unrealized	 	Unrealized	 	Fair	 	
(dollars in thousands)	 	Cost	 	Gains	 	Losses	 	Value	 	
September 30, 2009	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Available-for-Sale:	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Debt Securities Issued by the U.S. Treasury and Government Agencies	 	$	537,636	 	$	14,937	 	$	(462	)	$	552,111	 	
Debt Securities Issued by States and Political Subdivisions	 	61,968	 	2,343	 	(12	)	64,299	 	
Debt Securities Issued by U.S. Government-Sponsored Enterprises	 	751	 	51	 	—	 	802	 	
Mortgage-Backed Securities Issued by	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Government Agencies	 	2,869,636	 	39,826	 	(4,331	)	2,905,131	 	
U.S. Government-Sponsored Enterprises	 	1,145,778	 	52,845	 	—	 	1,198,623	 	
Private-Label Mortgage-Backed Securities	 	91,668	 	50	 	(10,292	)	81,426	 	
Total Mortgage-Backed Securities	 	4,107,082	 	92,721	 	(14,623	)	4,185,180	 	
Other Debt Securities	 	25,081	 	116	 	(1	)	25,196	 	
Total	 	$	4,732,518	 	$	110,168	 	$	(15,098	)	$	4,827,588	 	
Held-to-Maturity:	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Mortgage-Backed Securities Issued by	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Government Agencies	 	$	62,502	 	$	2,314	 	$	—	 	$	64,816	 	
U.S. Government-Sponsored Enterprises	 	131,942	 	4,360	 	—	 	136,302	 	
Total	 	$	194,444	 	$	6,674	 	$	—	 	$	201,118	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
December 31, 2008	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Available-for-Sale:	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Debt Securities Issued by the U.S. Treasury and Government Agencies	 	$	3,562	 	$	50	 	$	(51	)	$	3,561	 	
Debt Securities Issued by States and Political Subdivisions	 	47,033	 	1,028	 	(61	)	48,000	 	
Debt Securities Issued by U.S. Government-Sponsored Enterprises	 	232,269	 	973	 	(215	)	233,027	 	
Mortgage-Backed Securities Issued by	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Government Agencies	 	421,030	 	8,952	 	(852	)	429,130	 	
U.S. Government-Sponsored Enterprises	 	1,520,539	 	28,972	 	(335	)	1,549,176	 	
Private-Label Mortgage-Backed Securities	 	301,453	 	59	 	(45,199	)	256,313	 	
Total Mortgage-Backed Securities	 	2,243,022	 	37,983	 	(46,386	)	2,234,619	 	
Other Debt Securities	 	34	 	—	 	(2	)	32	 	
Total	 	$	2,525,920	 	$	40,034	 	$	(46,715	)	$	2,519,239	 	
Held-to-Maturity:	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Mortgage-Backed Securities Issued by	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Government Agencies	 	$	71,907	 	$	1,463	 	$	—	 	$	73,370	 	
U.S. Government-Sponsored Enterprises	 	167,728	 	1,735	 	(658	)	168,805	 	
Total	 	$	239,635	 	$	3,198	 	$	(658	)	$	242,175	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
September 30, 2008	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Available-for-Sale:	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Debt Securities Issued by the U.S. Treasury and Government Agencies	 	$	3,767	 	$	32	 	$	(19	)	$	3,780	 	
Debt Securities Issued by States and Political Subdivisions	 	47,079	 	117	 	(505	)	46,691	 	
Debt Securities Issued by U.S. Government-Sponsored Enterprises	 	232,268	 	57	 	(2,883	)	229,442	 	
Mortgage-Backed Securities Issued by	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Government Agencies	 	423,770	 	3,887	 	(3,533	)	424,124	 	
U.S. Government-Sponsored Enterprises	 	1,574,229	 	8,105	 	(9,787	)	1,572,547	 	
Private-Label Mortgage-Backed Securities	 	311,537	 	183	 	(19,229	)	292,491	 	
Total Mortgage-Backed Securities	 	2,309,536	 	12,175	 	(32,549	)	2,289,162	 	
Other Debt Securities	 	3,033	 	4	 	(1	)	3,036	 	
Total	 	$	2,595,683	 	$	12,385	 	$	(35,957	)	$	2,572,111	 	
Held-to-Maturity:	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Mortgage-Backed Securities Issued by	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Government Agencies	 	$	73,963	 	$	20	 	$	(1,722	)	$	72,261	 	
U.S. Government-Sponsored Enterprises	 	175,120	 	762	 	(2,423	)	173,459	 	
Total	 	$	249,083	 	$	782	 	$	(4,145	)	$	245,720	 	
 
10

Table of Contents
 
Investment securities pledged where the secured parties have the right to sell or repledge the investment securities had a carrying value of $2.9 billion as of September 30, 2009, $2.0 billion as of December 31, 2008, and $2.1 billion as of September 30, 2008.  These investment securities were pledged to secure deposits of governmental entities and securities sold under agreements to repurchase.
 
The table below presents an analysis of the contractual maturities of the Company’s investment securities as of September 30, 2009.  Mortgage-backed securities are disclosed separately in the table below as these investment securities may prepay prior to their scheduled contractual maturity dates.
 
Contractual Maturities	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
 	 	 	 	Gross	 	Gross	 	 	 	
 	 	Amortized	 	Unrealized	 	Unrealized	 	 	 	
(dollars in thousands)	 	Cost	 	Gains	 	Losses	 	Fair Value	 	
Available-for-Sale:	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Due in One Year or Less	 	$	86,742	 	$	125	 	$	(1	)	$	86,866	 	
Due After One Year Through Five Years	 	78,078	 	796	 	(14	)	78,860	 	
Due After Five Years Through Ten Years	 	153,559	 	3,384	 	(449	)	156,494	 	
Due After Ten Years	 	307,057	 	13,142	 	(11	)	320,188	 	
 	 	625,436	 	17,447	 	(475	)	642,408	 	
Mortgage-Backed Securities issued by	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Government Agencies	 	2,869,636	 	39,826	 	(4,331	)	2,905,131	 	
U.S. Government-Sponsored Enterprises	 	1,145,778	 	52,845	 	—	 	1,198,623	 	
Private-Label Mortgage-Backed Securities	 	91,668	 	50	 	(10,292	)	81,426	 	
Total Mortgage-Backed Securities	 	4,107,082	 	92,721	 	(14,623	)	4,185,180	 	
Total	 	$	4,732,518	 	$	110,168	 	$	(15,098	)	$	4,827,588	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Held-to-Maturity:	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Mortgage-Backed Securities issued by	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Government Agencies	 	$	62,502	 	$	2,314	 	$	—	 	$	64,816	 	
U.S. Government-Sponsored Enterprises	 	 	131,942	 	 	4,360	 	 	—	 	 	136,302	 	
Total	 	$	194,444	 	$	6,674	 	$	—	 	$	201,118	 	
 
Gross gains and losses from the sales of investment securities for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 were not significant.
 
11

Table of Contents
 
The Company’s temporarily impaired investment securities as of September 30, 2009, December 31, 2008, and September 30, 2008 were as follows:
 
Temporarily Impaired Investment Securities	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
 	 	Less Than 12 Months	 	12 Months or Longer	 	Total	 	
 	 	 	 	Gross	 	 	 	Gross	 	 	 	Gross	 	
 	 	 	 	Unrealized	 	 	 	Unrealized	 	 	 	Unrealized	 	
(dollars in thousands)	 	Fair Value	 	Losses	 	Fair Value	 	Losses	 	Fair Value	 	Losses	 	
September 30, 2009	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Debt Securities Issued by	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
the U.S. Treasury and Government Agencies	 	$	86,656	 	$	(427	)	$	1,831	 	$	(35	)	$	88,487	 	$	(462	)	
Debt Securities Issued by	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
States and Political Subdivisions	 	559	 	(1	)	323	 	(11	)	882	 	(12	)	
Mortgage-Backed Securities Issued by	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Government Agencies	 	393,823	 	(4,331	)	—	 	—	 	393,823	 	(4,331	)	
Private-Label Mortgage-Backed Securities	 	—	 	—	 	71,152	 	(10,292	)	71,152	 	(10,292	)	
Total Mortgage-Backed Securities	 	393,823	 	(4,331	)	71,152	 	(10,292	)	464,975	 	(14,623	)	
Other Debt Securities	 	—	 	—	 	34	 	(1	)	34	 	(1	)	
Total Temporarily Impaired Investment Securities	 	$	481,038	 	$	(4,759	)	$	73,340	 	$	(10,339	)	$	554,378	 	$	(15,098	)	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
December 31, 2008	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Debt Securities Issued by	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
the U.S. Treasury and Government Agencies	 	$	612	 	$	(12	)	$	1,591	 	$	(39	)	$	2,203	 	$	(51	)	
Debt Securities Issued by	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
States and Political Subdivisions	 	745	 	(11	)	284	 	(50	)	1,029	 	(61	)	
Debt Securities Issued by	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
U.S. Government-Sponsored Enterprises	 	18,763	 	(215	)	—	 	—	 	18,763	 	(215	)	
Mortgage-Backed Securities Issued by	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Government Agencies	 	73,638	 	(852	)	—	 	—	 	73,638	 	(852	)	
U.S. Government-Sponsored Enterprises	 	148,830	 	(536	)	59,385	 	(457	)	208,215	 	(993	)	
Private-Label Mortgage-Backed Securities	 	123,549	 	(16,641	)	121,482	 	(28,558	)	245,031	 	(45,199	)	
Total Mortgage-Backed Securities	 	346,017	 	(18,029	)	180,867	 	(29,015	)	526,884	 	(47,044	)	
Other Debt Securities	 	—	 	—	 	32	 	(2	)	32	 	(2	)	
Total Temporarily Impaired Investment Securities	 	$	366,137	 	$	(18,267	)	$	182,774	 	$	(29,106	)	$	548,911	 	$	(47,373	)	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
September 30, 2008	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Debt Securities Issued by	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
the U.S. Treasury and Government Agencies	 	$	584	 	$	(3	)	$	1,431	 	$	(16	)	$	2,015	 	$	(19	)	
Debt Securities Issued by	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
States and Political Subdivisions	 	30,278	 	(471	)	552	 	(34	)	30,830	 	(505	)	
Debt Securities Issued by	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
U.S. Government-Sponsored Enterprises	 	228,384	 	(2,883	)	—	 	—	 	228,384	 	(2,883	)	
Mortgage-Backed Securities Issued by	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Government Agencies	 	221,859	 	(3,693	)	54,780	 	(1,562	)	276,639	 	(5,255	)	
U.S. Government-Sponsored Enterprises	 	817,740	 	(10,718	)	61,444	 	(1,492	)	879,184	 	(12,210	)	
Private-Label Mortgage-Backed Securities	 	136,021	 	(5,883	)	140,490	 	(13,346	)	276,511	 	(19,229	)	
Total Mortgage-Backed Securities	 	1,175,620	 	(20,294	)	256,714	 	(16,400	)	1,432,334	 	(36,694	)	
Other Debt Securities	 	—	 	—	 	33	 	(1	)	33	 	(1	)	
Total Temporarily Impaired Investment Securities	 	$	1,434,866	 	$	(23,651	)	$	258,730	 	$	(16,451	)	$	1,693,596	 	$	(40,102	)	
 
The Company does not believe that the investment securities that were in an unrealized loss position as of September 30, 2009, which was comprised of 35 securities, represent an other-than-temporary impairment.  Total gross unrealized losses were primarily attributable to changes in interest rates and levels of market liquidity, relative to when the investment securities were purchased, and not due to the credit quality of the investment securities.
 
12

Table of Contents
 
The gross unrealized losses reported for mortgage-backed securities relate to investment securities issued by government agencies such as the Government National Mortgage Association, U.S. government-sponsored enterprises such as the Federal National Mortgage Association and Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation, and private-label mortgage-backed securities.  In assessing private-label mortgage-backed securities for impairment, management considers, among other factors, the severity and duration of the depressed price indication, independent credit ratings, vintage, and credit enhancements, as well as performance indicators of the underlying assets in the security (e.g., default rates, delinquency rates).  As of September 30, 2009, the Company’s private-label mortgage-backed securities were prime jumbo, with an average amortized loan-to-value ratio of 62%, and an average credit enhancement of 6.0% of the par value outstanding.  As of September 30, 2009, 63% of the fair value of the Company’s private-label mortgage-backed securities was AAA-rated by at least one major rating agency and was originated prior to 2006.  Loans past due 90 days or more, underlying the private-label mortgage-backed securities, represented approximately 4.1% of the par value outstanding, or approximately $3.8 million as of September 30, 2009.  As of September 30, 2009, there were no “sub-prime” or “Alt-A” securities in our mortgage-backed securities portfolio.
 
Note 3.  Leasing Transactions
 
In May 2009, the Company replaced an existing leveraged lease with a direct financing lease with a sub-lessee to the leveraged lease transaction.  In recording this transaction, the Company removed $17.9 million in the net investment from the balance sheet and recorded a $4.4 million charge-off to the allowance for loan and lease losses.   The Company also recorded a $1.6 million benefit for income taxes which resulted from the over accrual of income taxes from the inception of the lease through the termination of the leveraged lease transaction.  The Company recorded a direct financing lease of $45.9 million and also recognized $32.4 million in non-recourse debt on the balance sheet, which was previously not recognized as an obligation of the Company under leveraged lease accounting treatment.
 
In April 2009, the Company sold its equity interest in a cargo aircraft resulting in a $2.8 million pre-tax gain for the Company.  After-tax gains from this transaction were $1.5 million.  In March 2009, the Company sold its equity interest in two watercraft leveraged leases resulting in a $10.0 million pre-tax gain for the Company.  After-tax gains from this transaction were $6.2 million.  The pre-tax gains from these sales transactions were recorded as a component of other noninterest income in the statement of income.
 
Note 4.  Securities Sold Under Agreements to Repurchase
 
The Company enters into agreements under which it sells securities subject to an obligation to repurchase the same or similar securities.  Under these arrangements, the Company may transfer legal control over the assets but still retain effective control through an agreement that both entitles and obligates the Company to repurchase the assets.  As a result, securities sold under agreements to repurchase are accounted for as collateralized financing arrangements and not as a sale and subsequent repurchase of securities.  The obligation to repurchase the securities is reflected as a liability in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Condition, while the securities underlying the securities sold under agreements to repurchase remain in the respective asset accounts and are delivered to and held in collateral by third party trustees.
 
13

Table of Contents
 
As of September 30, 2009, the contractual maturities of the Company’s securities sold under agreements to repurchase were as follows:
 
Contractual Maturities	 	 	 	
(dollars in thousands)	 	Amount	 	
Overnight	 	$	25,000	 	
2 to 30 Days	 	702,021	 	
31 to 90 Days	 	99,621	 	
Over 90 Days	 	698,113	 	
Total	 	$	1,524,755	 	
 
Note 5.  Business Segments
 
The Company’s business segments are defined as Retail Banking, Commercial Banking, Investment Services, and Treasury.  The Company’s internal management accounting process measures the performance of the business segments based on the management structure of the Company.  This process, which is not necessarily comparable with similar information for any other financial institution, uses various techniques to assign balance sheet and income statement amounts to the business segments, including allocations of income, expense, the provision for credit losses, and capital.  This process is dynamic and requires certain allocations based on judgment and other subjective factors.  Unlike financial accounting, there is no comprehensive, authoritative guidance for management accounting that is equivalent to GAAP.
 
Selected financial information for each business segment is presented below as of and for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008.
 
Business Segment Selected Financial Information	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
 	 	Retail	 	Commercial	 	Investment	 	Treasury	 	Consolidated	 	
(dollars in thousands)	 	Banking	 	Banking	 	Services	 	and Other	 	Total	 	
Three Months Ended September 30, 2009	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Net Interest Income	 	$	54,059	 	$	39,650	 	$	4,275	 	$	10,903	 	$	108,887	 	
Provision for Credit Losses	 	15,599	 	11,918	 	33	 	(50	)	27,500	 	
Net Interest Income After Provision for Credit Losses	 	38,460	 	27,732	 	4,242	 	10,953	 	81,387	 	
Noninterest Income	 	25,095	 	14,668	 	14,026	 	3,011	 	56,800	 	
Noninterest Expense	 	(42,380	)	(25,072	)	(14,952	)	(1,583	)	(83,987	)	
Income Before Provision for Income Taxes	 	21,175	 	17,328	 	3,316	 	12,381	 	54,200	 	
Provision for Income Taxes	 	(7,865	)	(6,195	)	(1,227	)	(2,442	)	(17,729	)	
Net Income	 	$	13,310	 	$	11,133	 	$	2,089	 	$	9,939	 	$	36,471	 	
Total Assets as of September 30, 2009	 	$	3,475,273	 	$	2,548,944	 	$	253,580	 	$	5,930,228	 	$	12,208,025	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Three Months Ended September 30, 2008	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Net Interest Income	 	$	61,524	 	$	33,280	 	$	3,922	 	$	4,849	 	$	103,575	 	
Provision for Credit Losses	 	7,395	 	11,906	 	1,089	 	(32	)	20,358	 	
Net Interest Income After Provision for Credit Losses	 	54,129	 	21,374	 	2,833	 	4,881	 	83,217	 	
Noninterest Income	 	24,362	 	13,378	 	17,458	 	1,788	 	56,986	 	
Noninterest Expense	 	(42,545	)	(25,164	)	(16,800	)	(2,281	)	(86,790	)	
Income Before Provision for Income Taxes	 	35,946	 	9,588	 	3,491	 	4,388	 	53,413	 	
Provision for Income Taxes	 	(13,301	)	(4,993	)	(1,292	)	13,582	 	(6,004	)	
Net Income	 	$	22,645	 	$	4,595	 	$	2,199	 	$	17,970	 	$	47,409	 	
Total Assets as of September 30, 2008	 	$	3,987,651	 	$	2,703,677	 	$	285,497	 	$	3,358,222	 	$	10,335,047	 	
 
14

Table of Contents
 
Business Segment Selected Financial Information - Continued	 	
 	 	Retail	 	Commercial	 	Investment	 	Treasury	 	Consolidated	 	
(dollars in thousands)	 	Banking	 	Banking	 	Services	 	and Other	 	Total	 	
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Net Interest Income	 	$	167,166	 	$	118,780	 	$	12,593	 	$	10,261	 	$	308,800	 	
Provision for Credit Losses	 	44,921	 	34,868	 	1,583	 	(295	)	81,077	 	
Net Interest Income After Provision for Credit Losses	 	122,245	 	83,912	 	11,010	 	10,556	 	227,723	 	
Noninterest Income	 	78,761	 	55,032	 	43,086	 	10,118	 	186,997	 	
Noninterest Expense	 	(130,165	)	(78,453	)	(47,309	)	(5,577	)	(261,504	)	
Income Before Provision for Income Taxes	 	70,841	 	60,491	 	6,787	 	15,097	 	153,216	 	
Provision for Income Taxes	 	(26,264	)	(21,964	)	(2,511	)	1,040	 	(49,699	)	
Net Income	 	$	44,577	 	$	38,527	 	$	4,276	 	$	16,137	 	$	103,517	 	
Total Assets as of September 30, 2009	 	$	3,475,273	 	$	2,548,944	 	$	253,580	 	$	5,930,228	 	$	12,208,025	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Net Interest Income	 	$	186,336	 	$	112,568	 	$	11,731	 	$	2,288	 	$	312,923	 	
Provision for Credit Losses	 	21,414	 	20,289	 	1,089	 	(835	)	41,957	 	
Net Interest Income After Provision for Credit Losses	 	164,922	 	92,279	 	10,642	 	3,123	 	270,966	 	
Noninterest Income	 	73,090	 	52,411	 	54,738	 	23,411	 	203,650	 	
Noninterest Expense	 	(126,772	)	(75,312	)	(50,026	)	(11,974	)	(264,084	)	
Income Before Provision for Income Taxes	 	111,240	 	69,378	 	15,354	 	14,560	 	210,532	 	
Provision for Income Taxes	 	(41,196	)	(27,133	)	(5,681	)	16,384	 	(57,626	)	
Net Income	 	$	70,044	 	$	42,245	 	$	9,673	 	$	30,944	 	$	152,906	 	
Total Assets as of September 30, 2008	 	$	3,987,651	 	$	2,703,677	 	$	285,497	 	$	3,358,222	 	$	10,335,047	 	
 
Note 6.  Pension Plans and Postretirement Benefit Plan
 
The components of net periodic benefit cost for the Company’s pension plans and the postretirement benefit plan for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 are presented in the following table:
 
Pension Plans and Postretirement Benefit Plan	 	
 	 	             Pension Benefits1	 	Postretirement Benefits	 	
(dollars in thousands)	 	2009	 	2008	 	 	2009	 	2008	 	
Three Months Ended September 30,	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Service Cost	 	$	—	 	$	—	 	 	$	109	 	$	89	 	
Interest Cost	 	1,285	 	1,298	 	 	419	 	420	 	
Expected Return on Plan Assets	 	(1,332	)	(1,522	)	 	—	 	—	 	
Amortization of Prior Service Credit	 	—	 	—	 	 	(53	)	(53	)	
Recognized Net Actuarial Losses (Gains)	 	732	 	270	 	 	(119	)	(140	)	
Net Periodic Benefit Cost	 	$	685	 	$	46	 	 	$	356	 	$	316	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Nine Months Ended September 30,	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Service Cost	 	$	—	 	$	—	 	 	$	328	 	$	267	 	
Interest Cost	 	3,854	 	3,893	 	 	1,258	 	1,260	 	
Expected Return on Plan Assets	 	(3,995	)	(4,565	)	 	—	 	—	 	
Amortization of Prior Service Credit	 	—	 	—	 	 	(159	)	(159	)	
Recognized Net Actuarial Losses (Gains)	 	2,195	 	810	 	 	(358	)	(420	)	
Net Periodic Benefit Cost	 	$	2,054	 	$	138	 	 	$	1,069	 	$	948	 	
 
1       The Company has two defined benefit plans.  In 1995, the Company froze its non-contributory, qualified defined benefit retirement plan and excess retirement plan, which covered employees of the Company and participating subsidiaries who met certain eligibility requirements.
 
The net periodic benefit cost for the Company’s pension plans and postretirement benefit plan are recorded as a component of salaries and benefits in the statements of income.  The Company expects to contribute $12.0 million to its pension plans and $1.2 million to the postretirement benefit plan for the year ending December 31, 2009.  For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, the Company contributed $10.6 million and $11.4 million, respectively, to its pension plans.  For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, the Company contributed $0.3 million and $0.9 million, respectively, to its postretirement benefit plan.
 
15

Table of Contents
 
Note 7.  Derivative Financial Instruments
 
The following table presents the Company’s derivative financial instruments, their estimated fair values, and balance sheet location as of September 30, 2009:
 
Fair Values of Derivative Financial Instruments	
 	 	As of September 30, 2009	 	
 	 	Asset Derivatives	 	 	Liability Derivatives	 	
Derivative Financial Instruments Not Designated as
Hedging Instruments (dollars in thousands)	 	Balance Sheet
Location	 	Fair Value	 	 	Balance Sheet
Location	 	Fair Value	 	
Forward Commitments	 	Other Assets	 	$	121	 	 	Other Liabilities	 	$	430	 	
Interest Rate Lock Commitments	 	Other Assets	 	1,671	 	 	Other Liabilities	 	57	 	
Interest Rate Swap Agreements	 	Other Assets	 	23,788	 	 	Other Liabilities	 	23,994	 	
Foreign Exchange Contracts	 	Other Assets	 	206	 	 	Other Liabilities	 	464	 	
Total Derivative Financial Instruments
Not Designated as Hedging Instruments	 	 	 	$	25,786	 	 	 	 	$	24,945	 	
 
The following table presents the Company’s derivative financial instruments and the amount and location of the net gains and losses recognized in the statements of income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009:
 
The Effect of Derivative Financial Instruments on the Consolidated Statements of Income	 	
 	 	Three Months Ended September 30, 2009	 	 	Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009	 	
Derivative Financial Instruments
Not Designated as Hedging
Instruments (dollars in thousands)	 	Location of Net Gains
(Losses) Recognized in the
Statement of Income	 	Amount of Net Gains
(Losses) Recognized in
the Statement of Income	 	Location of Net Gains
Recognized in the
Statement of Income	 	Amount of Net Gains
Recognized in the
Statement of Income	 	
Forward Commitments	 	Mortgage Banking	 	$	(942	)	Mortgage Banking	 	$	952	 	
Interest Rate Lock Commitments	 	Mortgage Banking	 	4,124	 	Mortgage Banking	 	11,146	 	
Interest Rate Swap Agreements	 	Other Noninterest Income	 	31	 	Other Noninterest Income	 	808	 	
Foreign Exchange Contracts	 	Other Noninterest Income	 	815	 	Other Noninterest Income	 	2,126	 	
Total Derivative Financial Instruments
Not Designated as Hedging Instruments	 	 	 	$	4,028	 	 	 	$	15,032	 	
 
Management has received authorization from the Bank’s Board of Directors to use derivative financial instruments as an end-user in connection with its risk management activities and to accommodate the needs of its customers.  The Company has elected not to qualify for hedge accounting methods addressed under current provisions of GAAP.  All risk management derivative instruments are stated at fair value in the Consolidated Statements of Condition with changes in fair value reported in earnings.
 
The Company is a party to derivative financial instruments in the normal course of its business to meet the financing needs of its customers and to a lesser extent, manage exposure to fluctuations in interest and foreign exchange rates.  Where derivative financial instruments have been entered into to facilitate the risk management activities of our customers, the Company generally enters into transactions with dealers to offset risk exposure.  These financial instruments have been limited to forward commitments, interest rate lock commitments, interest rate swap agreements, and foreign exchange contracts.
 
The Company enters into forward commitments for the future delivery of residential mortgage loans to reduce interest rate risk associated with loans held for sale and interest rate lock commitments to fund loans at a specified interest rate.  Changes in the estimated fair value of forward commitments and interest rate lock commitments subsequent to inception are based on changes in the fair value of the underlying loan resulting from the fulfillment of the commitment and changes in the probability that the loan will fund within the terms of the commitment, which is affected primarily by changes in interest rates and the passage of time.  At
 
16

Table of Contents
 
inception and during the life of the interest rate lock commitment, the Company includes the expected net future cash flows related to the associated servicing of the loan as part of the fair value measurement of the interest rate lock commitments.
 
The Company’s interest rate swap agreements are to facilitate the risk management strategies of a small number of commercial banking customers.  The Company mitigates this risk by entering into equal and offsetting interest rate swap agreements.  The Company utilizes foreign exchange contracts to offset risks related to transactions executed on behalf of customers.
 
As with any financial instrument, derivative financial instruments have inherent risks.  Adverse changes in interest rates, foreign exchange rates, and equity prices affect the Company’s market risks.  The market risks are balanced with the expected returns to enhance earnings performance and shareholder value, while limiting the volatility of each.  The Company uses various processes to monitor its overall market risk exposure, including sensitivity analysis, value-at-risk calculations, and other methodologies.
 
The Company’s exposure to derivative credit risk is defined as the possibility of sustaining a loss due to the failure of the counterparty to perform in accordance with the terms of the contract.  Credit risk associated with derivative financial instruments is similar to those relating to traditional on-balance sheet financial instruments.  The Company manages derivative credit risk with the same standards and procedures applied to its commercial lending activities.
 
Note 8.  Fair Value of Financial Assets and Liabilities
 
Fair Value Hierarchy
 
Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in the principal or most advantageous market for an asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date.  GAAP established a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the use of inputs used in valuation methodologies into the following three levels:
 
Level 1:         Inputs to the valuation methodology are quoted prices, unadjusted, for identical assets or liabilities in active markets.  A quoted price in an active market provides the most reliable evidence of fair value and shall be used to measure fair value whenever available.
 
Level 2:         Inputs to the valuation methodology include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; inputs to the valuation methodology include quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active; or inputs to the valuation methodology that are derived principally from or can be corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means.
 
Level 3:         Inputs to the valuation methodology are unobservable and significant to the fair value measurement.  Level 3 assets and liabilities include financial instruments whose value is determined using discounted cash flow methodologies, as well as instruments for which the determination of fair value requires significant management judgment or estimation.
 
A financial asset or liability’s categorization within the fair value hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.  Management reviews and updates the fair value hierarchy classifications of the Company’s financial assets and liabilities on a quarterly basis.
 
17

Table of Contents
 
Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
 
The table below presents the balances of assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of September 30, 2009, December 31, 2008, and September 30, 2008:
 
Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis	 	
 	 	Quoted Prices in	 	Significant	 	 	 	 	 	
 	 	Active Markets	 	Other	 	Significant	 	 	 	
 	 	for Identical	 	Observable	 	Unobservable	 	 	 	
 	 	Assets or Liabilities	 	Inputs	 	Inputs	 	 	 	
(dollars in thousands)	 	(Level 1)	 	(Level 2)	 	(Level 3)	 	Total	 	
September 30, 2009	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Investment Securities Available-for-Sale	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Debt Securities Issued by the U.S. Treasury and Government Agencies	 	$	549,582	 	$	2,529	 	$	—	 	$	552,111	 	
Debt Securities Issued by States and Political Subdivisions	 	—	 	64,299	 	—	 	64,299	 	
Debt Securities Issued by U.S. Government-Sponsored Enterprises	 	—	 	802	 	—	 	802	 	
Mortgage-Backed Securities Issued by	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Government Agencies	 	—	 	2,905,131	 	—	 	2,905,131	 	
U.S. Government-Sponsored Enterprises	 	—	 	1,198,623	 	—	 	1,198,623	 	
Private-Label Mortgage-Backed Securities	 	—	 	81,426	 	—	 	81,426	 	
Total Mortgage-Backed Securities	 	—	 	4,185,180	 	—	 	4,185,180	 	
Other Debt Securities	 	—	 	25,196	 	—	 	25,196	 	
Total Investment Securities Available-for-Sale	 	549,582	 	4,278,006	 	—	 	4,827,588	 	
Mortgage Servicing Rights	 	—	 	—	 	15,972	 	15,972	 	
Other Assets	 	8,382	 	—	 	—	 	8,382	 	
Net Derivative Assets and Liabilities	 	—	 	(567	)	1,408	 	841	 	
Total Assets Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis as of September 30, 2009	 	$	557,964	 	$	4,277,439	 	$	17,380	 	$	4,852,783	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
December 31, 2008	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Investment Securities Trading	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Mortgage-Backed Securities Issued by	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Government Agencies	 	$	—	 	$	24,370	 	$	—	 	$	24,370	 	
U.S. Government-Sponsored Enterprises	 	—	 	67,130	 	—	 	67,130	 	
Total Investment Securities Trading	 	—	 	91,500	 	—	 	91,500	 	
Investment Securities Available-for-Sale	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Debt Securities Issued by the U.S. Treasury and Government Agencies	 	576	 	2,985	 	—	 	3,561	 	
Debt Securities Issued by States and Political Subdivisions	 	—	 	48,000	 	—	 	48,000	 	
Debt Securities Issued by U.S. Government-Sponsored Enterprises	 	1	 	233,026	 	—	 	233,027	 	
Mortgage-Backed Securities Issued by	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Government Agencies	 	—	 	429,130	 	—	 	429,130	 	
U.S. Government-Sponsored Enterprises	 	—	 	1,493,461	 	55,715	 	1,549,176	 	
Private-Label Mortgage-Backed Securities	 	—	 	256,313	 	—	 	256,313	 	
Total Mortgage-Backed Securities	 	—	 	2,178,904	 	55,715	 	2,234,619	 	
Other Debt Securities	 	—	 	32	 	—	 	32	 	
Total Investment Securities Available-for-Sale	 	577	 	2,462,947	 	55,715	 	2,519,239	 	
Mortgage Servicing Rights	 	—	 	—	 	19,553	 	19,553	 	
Other Assets	 	6,674	 	—	 	—	 	6,674	 	
Net Derivative Assets and Liabilities	 	—	 	(951	)	3,051	 	2,100	 	
Total Assets Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis as of December 31, 2008	 	$	7,251	 	$	2,553,496	 	$	78,319	 	$	2,639,066	 	
Long-Term Debt	 	$	—	 	$	—	 	$	119,275	 	$	119,275	 	
Total Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis as of December 31, 2008	 	$	—	 	$	—	 	$	119,275	 	$	119,275	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
September 30, 2008	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Investment Securities Trading	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Mortgage-Backed Securities Issued by	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Government Agencies	 	$	—	 	$	24,660	 	$	—	 	$	24,660	 	
U.S. Government-Sponsored Enterprises	 	—	 	66,333	 	—	 	66,333	 	
Total Investment Securities Trading	 	—	 	90,993	 	—	 	90,993	 	
Investment Securities Available-for-Sale	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Debt Securities Issued by the U.S. Treasury and Government Agencies	 	678	 	3,102	 	—	 	3,780	 	
Debt Securities Issued by States and Political Subdivisions	 	—	 	46,691	 	—	 	46,691	 	
Debt Securities Issued by U.S. Government-Sponsored Enterprises	 	—	 	229,442	 	—	 	229,442	 	
Mortgage-Backed Securities Issued by	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Government Agencies	 	—	 	424,124	 	—	 	424,124	 	
U.S. Government-Sponsored Enterprises	 	—	 	1,572,547	 	—	 	1,572,547	 	
Private-Label Mortgage-Backed Securities	 	1	 	292,490	 	—	 	292,491	 	
Total Mortgage-Backed Securities	 	1	 	2,289,161	 	—	 	2,289,162	 	
Other Debt Securities	 	—	 	3,036	 	—	 	3,036	 	
Total Investment Securities Available-for-Sale	 	679	 	2,571,432	 	—	 	2,572,111	 	
Mortgage Servicing Rights	 	—	 	—	 	27,057	 	27,057	 	
Other Assets	 	8,365	 	—	 	—	 	8,365	 	
Net Derivative Assets and Liabilities	 	—	 	702	 	(12	)	690	 	
Total Assets Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis as of September 30, 2008	 	$	9,044	 	$	2,663,127	 	$	27,045	 	$	2,699,216	 	
Long-Term Debt	 	$	—	 	$	—	 	$	120,598	 	$	120,598	 	
Total Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis as of September 30, 2008	 	$	—	 	$	—	 	$	120,598	 	$	120,598	 	
 
18

Table of Contents
 
The Company sold its investment securities trading portfolio during the three months ended March 31, 2009. As of September 30, 2009, the Company had no liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis.
 
For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 and September 30, 2008, the changes in Level 3 assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis were as follows:
 
 	 	 	 	Net Derivative	 	 	 	
 	 	Mortgage	 	Assets and	 	 	 	
Assets(dollars in thousands)	 	Servicing Rights1	 	Liabilities 2	 	Total	 	
Three Months Ended September 30, 2009	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Balance as of July 1, 2009	 	$	16,833	 	$	741	 	$	17,574	 	
Realized and Unrealized Net Gains (Losses) Included in Net Income	 	(861	)	4,155	 	3,294	 	
Purchases, Sales, Issuances, and Settlements, Net	 	—	 	(3,488	)	(3,488	)	
Balance as of September 30, 2009	 	$	15,972	 	$	1,408	 	$	17,380	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Total Unrealized Net Gains (Losses) Included in Net Income
Related to Assets Still Held as of September 30, 2009	 	$	(78	)	$	1,408	 	$	1,330	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
 	 	Investment	 	 	 	Net Derivative	 	 	 	
 	 	Securities	 	Mortgage	 	Assets and	 	 	 	
Assets(dollars in thousands)	 	Available-for-Sale 3	 	Servicing Rights1	 	Liabilities 2	 	Total	 	
Three Months Ended September 30, 2008	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Balance as of July 1, 2008	 	$	25,016	 	$	30,272	 	$	326	 	$	55,614	 	
Realized and Unrealized Net Gains (Losses):	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Included in Net Income	 	—	 	(3,349	)	1,842	 	(1,507	)	
Included in Other Comprehensive Income	 	(16	)	—	 	—	 	(16	)	
Purchases, Sales, Issuances, and Settlements, Net	 	(25,000	)	134	 	(2,180	)	(27,046	)	
Balance as of September 30, 2008	 	$	—	 	$	27,057	 	$	(12	)	$	27,045	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Total Unrealized Net Losses Included in Net Income
Related to Assets Still Held as of September 30, 2008	 	$	—	 	$	(2,894	)	$	(12	)	$	(2,906	)	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Liabilities(dollars in thousands)	 	Long-Term Debt4	 	Total	 	 	 	 	 	
Three Months Ended September 30, 2008	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Balance as of July 1, 2008	 	$	121,326	 	$	121,326	 	 	 	 	 	
Unrealized Net Gains Included in Net Income	 	(728	)	(728	)	 	 	 	 	
Balance as of September 30, 2008	 	$	120,598	 	$	120,598	 	 	 	 	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Total Unrealized Net Gains Included in Net Income
Related to Liabilities Still Held as of September 30, 2008	 	$	(728	)	$	(728	)	 	 	 	 	
 
19

Table of Contents
 
 	 	Investment	 	 	 	Net Derivative	 	 	 	
 	 	Securities	 	Mortgage	 	Assets and	 	 	 	
Assets(dollars in thousands)	 	Available-for-Sale 3	 	Servicing Rights1	 	Liabilities 2	 	Total	 	
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Balance as of January 1, 2009	 	$	55,715	 	$	19,553	 	$	3,051	 	$	78,319	 	
Realized and Unrealized Net Gains (Losses)	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Included in Net Income	 	—	 	(3,581	)	11,954	 	8,373	 	
Purchases, Sales, Issuances, and Settlements, Net	 	(55,715	)	—	 	(13,597	)	(69,312	)	
Balance as of September 30, 2009	 	$	—	 	$	15,972	 	$	1,408	 	$	17,380	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Total Unrealized Net Gains Included in Net Income
Related to Assets Still Held as of September 30, 2009	 	$	—	 	$	29	 	$	1,408	 	$	1,437	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Liabilities(dollars in thousands)	 	Long-Term Debt4	 	Total	 	 	 	 	 	
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Balance as of January 1, 2009	 	$	119,275	 	$	119,275	 	 	 	 	 	
Unrealized Net Gains Included in Net Income	 	(304	)	(304	)	 	 	 	 	
Purchases, Sales, Issuances, and Settlements, Net	 	(118,971	)	(118,971	)	 	 	 	 	
Balance as of September 30, 2009	 	$	—	 	$	—	 	 	 	 	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
 	 	Investment	 	 	 	Net Derivative	 	 	 	
 	 	Securities	 	Mortgage	 	Assets and	 	 	 	
Assets(dollars in thousands)	 	Available-for-Sale 3	 	Servicing Rights1	 	Liabilities 2	 	Total	 	
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Balance as of January 1, 2008	 	$	218,980	 	$	27,588	 	$	113	 	$	246,681	 	
Realized and Unrealized Net Gains (Losses):	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Included in Net Income	 	—	 	(4,248	)	5,328	 	1,080	 	
Included in Other Comprehensive Income	 	1,012	 	—	 	—	 	1,012	 	
Purchases, Sales, Issuances, and Settlements, Net	 	(219,992	)	3,717	 	(5,453	)	(221,728	)	
Balance as of September 30, 2008	 	$	—	 	$	27,057	 	$	(12	)	$	27,045	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Total Unrealized Net Losses Included in Net Income
Related to Assets Still Held as of September 30, 2008	 	$	—	 	$	(2,241	)	$	(12	)	$	(2,253	)	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Liabilities(dollars in thousands)	 	Long-Term Debt4	 	Total	 	 	 	 	 	
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Balance as of January 1, 2008	 	$	129,032	 	$	129,032	 	 	 	 	 	
Unrealized Net Gains Included in Net Income	 	(2,434	)	(2,434	)	 	 	 	 	
Purchases, Sales, Issuances, and Settlements, Net	 	(6,000	)	(6,000	)	 	 	 	 	
Balance as of September 30, 2008	 	$	120,598	 	$	120,598	 	 	 	 	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Total Unrealized Net Gains Included in Net Income
Related to Liabilities Still Held as of September 30, 2008	 	$	(2,239	)	$	(2,239	)	 	 	 	 	
 
1	Realized and unrealized gains and losses related to mortgage servicing rights are reported as a component of mortgage banking income in the Company’s consolidated statements of income.	
2	Realized and unrealized gains and losses related to interest rate lock commitments are reported as a component of mortgage banking income in the Company’s consolidated statements of income. Realized and unrealized gains and losses related to interest rate swap agreements are recorded as a component of other noninterest income in the Company’s consolidated statements of income.	
3	Unrealized gains and losses related to investment securities available-for-sale are reported as a component of other comprehensive income in the Company’s consolidated statements of condition.	
4	Realized and unrealized gains and losses related to long-term debt are reported as a component of other noninterest income in the Company’s consolidated statements of income.	
 
Mortgage servicing rights do not trade in an active market with readily observable market data.  As a result, the Company estimates the fair value of mortgage servicing rights by using a discounted cash flow model to calculate the present value of estimated future net servicing income.  The assumptions used in the discounted cash flow model are thought to be those that market participants would use in estimating future net servicing income, including estimates of loan prepayment rates, servicing costs, ancillary income, impound account balances, and discount rates.  Significant assumptions in the valuation of mortgage servicing rights include changes in interest rates, estimated loan repayment rates, and the timing of cash flows, among other factors.  As of September 30, 2009, the Company had
 
20

Table of Contents
 
mortgage servicing rights accounted for under the fair value measurement method and amortization method of $16.0 million and $9.4 million, respectively.
 
The fair values of interest rate lock commitments and interest rate swap agreements are Level 3 measurements as significant unobservable inputs and management judgment is required.  The most significant unobservable assumption used in valuing the interest rate lock commitments is the fall-out ratio.  The fall-out ratio is derived from the Bank’s internal data and is adjusted using significant management judgment as to the percentage of loans which are currently in a lock position which will ultimately not close.  The fair values of interest rate swap agreements are calculated using a discounted cash flow approach.
 
Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis
 
As of September 30, 2009 and 2008, there were no adjustments to fair value for the Company’s assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis in accordance with GAAP.  As of December 31, 2008, the Company recorded a $0.3 million adjustment to fair value related to the Company’s mortgage servicing rights recorded under the amortization method.  The fair value of the Company’s mortgage servicing rights recorded under the amortization method was $1.5 million as of December 31, 2008 and is classified as a Level 3 measurement.
 
As of September 30, 2009, December 31, 2008, and September 30, 2008, there were no adjustments to fair value for the Company’s liabilities measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis in accordance with GAAP.
 
Fair Value Option
 
On January 1, 2008, the Company elected the fair value option for its subordinated notes, a component of long-term debt in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Condition.  The fair value option was elected for the subordinated notes as it provided the Company with an opportunity to better manage its interest rate risk and to achieve balance sheet management flexibility.  Changes in the estimated fair value of the Company’s subordinated notes subsequent to the initial fair value measurement were recognized in earnings as a component of other noninterest income.  For the three months ended September 30, 2008, the Company recorded unrealized gains of $0.7 million as a result of the change in fair value of the Company’s subordinated notes.  For the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, the Company recorded unrealized gains of $0.3 million and $2.4 million, respectively, as a result of the change in fair value of the Company’s subordinated notes.  Interest expense related to the Company’s subordinated notes continued to be measured based on contractual interest rates and was reported as such in the statement of income.  The Company repaid its subordinated notes at maturity in March 2009.
 
Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments
 
These disclosures exclude financial instruments that are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis on the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Condition as well as short-term financial assets such as cash and cash equivalents, and liabilities such as short-term borrowings, for which the carrying amounts approximate fair value.  The assumptions used below are expected to approximate those that market participants would use in valuing these financial instruments.
 
Investment Securities Held-to-Maturity
 
The fair value of the Company’s investment securities held-to-maturity was primarily measured using information from a third-party pricing service.  Quoted prices in active markets were used whenever available.  If quoted prices were not available, estimated fair values were measured using pricing models or other valuation techniques such as the present value of future cash flows, adjusted for credit loss assumptions.
 
21

Table of Contents
 
Loans Held for Sale
 
The estimated fair value of the Company’s loans held for sale was determined based on contractual prices for loans with similar characteristics.
 
Loans
 
The estimated fair value of the Company’s loans was determined by discounting the expected future cash flows of pools of loans with similar characteristics.  Loans were first segregated by type such as commercial, real estate, and consumer, and were then further segmented into fixed and variable rate and loan quality categories.  Expected future cash flows were projected based on contractual cash flows, adjusted for estimated prepayments.  Low market liquidity resulted in wider market spreads, which adversely affected the estimated fair value of the Company’s loans as of December 31, 2008, and September 30, 2008.
 
Deposit Liabilities
 
The estimated fair values of the Company’s noninterest-bearing and interest-bearing demand deposits and savings deposits were equal to the amount payable on demand (i.e., their carrying amounts) because these products have no stated maturity.  The estimated fair values of the Company’s time deposits were estimated using discounted cash flow analyses.  The discount rates used were based on rates currently offered for deposits with similar remaining maturities.
 
Long-Term Debt
 
The estimated fair values of the Company’s long-term debt were calculated using a discounted cash flow approach and applying discount rates currently offered for new notes with similar remaining maturities and considering the Company’s non-performance risk.
 
The following presents the carrying amount and fair values of the Company’s financial instruments as of September 30, 2009, December 31, 2008, and September 30, 2008:
 
 	 	 September 30, 2009	 	 December 31, 2008	 	  September 30, 2008	 	
 	 	Carrying	 	Fair	 	 	Carrying	 	Fair	 	 	Carrying	 	Fair	 	
(dollars in thousands)	 	Amount	 	Value	 	 	Amount	 	Value	 	 	Amount	 	Value	 	
Financial Instruments - Assets	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Investment Securities Held-to-Maturity	 	$	194,444	 	$	201,118	 	 	$	239,635	 	$	242,175	 	 	$	249,083	 	$	245,720	 	
Loans Held for Sale	 	19,346	 	19,346	 	 	21,540	 	21,540	 	 	14,903	 	14,903	 	
Loans1	 	5,352,297	 	5,557,554	 	 	5,969,907	 	5,917,302	 	 	5,992,083	 	5,775,194	 	
Financial Instruments - Liabilities	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Deposits	 	9,250,100	 	9,265,131	 	 	8,292,098	 	8,313,471	 	 	7,658,484	 	7,657,535	 	
Long-Term Debt2	 	82,437	 	84,318	 	 	75,000	 	73,925	 	 	75,000	 	73,639	 	

1	Comprised of loans, net of unearned income and the Allowance related to loans.	
2	Excludes capitalized lease obligations and subordinated notes which were recorded at fair value on the Company’s consolidated statements of condition beginning on January 1, 2008.	
 
22

Table of Contents

Item 2.  Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
 
Forward-Looking Statements
 
This report contains forward-looking statements concerning, among other things, the economic and business environment in our service area and elsewhere, credit quality, and other financial and business matters in future periods.  Our forward-looking statements are based on numerous assumptions, any of which could prove to be inaccurate and actual results may differ materially from those projected because of a variety of risks and uncertainties, including, but not limited to: 1) general economic conditions either nationally, internationally, or locally may be different than expected; 2) unanticipated changes in the securities markets, public debt markets, and other capital markets in the U.S. and globally; 3) the effect of the increase in government intervention in the U.S. financial system; 4) competitive pressure among financial services and products; 5) the impact of legislation and changes in the regulatory environment; 6) changes in fiscal and monetary policies of the markets in which we operate; 7) actual or alleged conduct which could harm our reputation; 8) changes in accounting standards; 9) changes in tax laws or regulations or the interpretation of such laws and regulations; 10) changes in our credit quality or risk profile that may increase or decrease the required level of our reserve for credit losses; 11) changes in market interest rates that may affect credit markets and our ability to maintain our net interest margin; 12) unpredicted costs and other consequences of legal or regulatory matters involving the Company; 13) resumption of common stock repurchases; and 14) geopolitical risk, military or terrorist activity, natural disasters, or adverse weather, public health, and other conditions impacting us and our customers’ operations.  For a detailed discussion of these and other risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results and events to differ materially from such forward-looking statements, refer to the section entitled “Risk Factors” in Part I of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, and subsequent periodic and current reports, filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”).  Words such as “believes,” “anticipates,” “expects,” “intends,” “targeted,” and similar
expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements but are not exclusive means of identifying such statements.  We do not undertake an obligation to update forward-looking statements to reflect later events or circumstances.
 
Reclassifications
 
Certain prior period information in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (“MD&A”) has been reclassified to conform to current period classifications.
 
Overview
 
Bank of Hawaii Corporation (the “Parent”) is a bank holding company headquartered in Honolulu, Hawaii.  The Parent’s principal and only operating subsidiary is Bank of Hawaii (the “Bank”).
 
The Bank, directly and through its subsidiaries, provides a broad range of financial services to businesses, consumers, and governments in Hawaii, American Samoa, and the West Pacific.  References to “we,” “our,” “us,” or the “Company” refer to the holding company and its subsidiaries that are consolidated for financial reporting purposes.
 
Our vision is “exceptional people building exceptional value for our customers, our island communities, our shareholders, and each other.”  “Maximizing shareholder value over time” remains our governing objective.
 
In striving to achieve our vision and governing objective, our business plan was balanced between growth and risk management, and included the flexibility to adjust, given our anticipation of a slowing economy.  We did not, however, expect an economic downturn of the magnitude that occurred in 2008 and has continued into 2009.  Accordingly, we adjusted some of the strategies in our business plan.  The adjustments to our strategies included an increased priority to actions that result in strengthening measures of soundness such as asset quality, reserve and capital levels, and liquidity.

23

Table of Contents

Hawaii Economy
 
Hawaii’s economy during the third quarter of 2009 continued to reflect weakness primarily the result of slow national economic conditions and lower visitor activity in the state.  Visitor arrivals appear to be stabilizing.  However, visitor spending continues to decline as a result of discounting.  State general fund revenues have declined 14.4% for the first eight months of 2009, primarily due to a decline in general excise and use tax revenues.  Total jobs have contracted 3.1% from the beginning of the year.  The statewide unemployment rate improved slightly from June 30, 2009 to 7.2% on a seasonally adjusted basis as of September 30, 2009.  Residential real estate prices in Hawaii continue to hold their value better than many U. S. mainland markets and months of inventory declined from June 30, 2009 to 5.3 months as of September 30, 2009.
 
Earnings Summary
 
For the third quarter of 2009, net income was $36.5 million, a decrease of $10.9 million from the third quarter of 2008.  Diluted earnings per share were $0.76 per share, a decrease of $0.23 per share from the third quarter of 2008.
 
Our lower net income for the third quarter of 2009 was primarily due to the following:
 
·                 The provision for credit losses (the “Provision”) increased by $7.1 million from the third quarter of 2008;
·                 Our Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) insurance expense increased by $3.0 million from the third quarter of 2008; and
·                 Our provision for income taxes was $11.7 million lower in the third quarter of 2008, primarily due to the effective settlement of our Sale In-Lease Out (“SILO”) transactions, which resulted in a $12.9 million credit to the provision for income taxes in the third quarter of 2008.
The impact of these items was partially offset by a $5.3 million increase in net interest income due to lower funding costs and higher interest income from our larger investment securities portfolio.
 
For the first nine months of 2009, net income was $103.5 million, a decrease of $49.4 million from the first nine months of 2008.  Diluted earnings per share were $2.16 per share, a decrease of $1.01 per share from the first nine months of 2008.
 
Our lower net income for the first nine months of 2009 was primarily due to the following:
 
·                 The Provision increased by $39.1 million from the first nine months of 2008;
·                 Noninterest income decreased by $16.7 million from the first nine months of 2008, primarily due to pre-tax gains of $13.7 million recorded in the first quarter of 2008 resulting from the mandatory redemption of our Visa, Inc. (“Visa”) shares;
·                 The previously noted effective settlement of our SILO transactions;
·                 Our FDIC insurance expense increased by $13.3 million from the first nine months of 2008.  This increase was due in part to the Company’s $5.7 million share of an industry-wide assessment recorded in the second quarter of 2009; and
·                 Net interest income decreased by $4.1 million and our net interest margin decreased by 52 basis points from the first nine months of 2008, reflecting the effects of a decreasing interest rate environment, lower loan balances, conservative investing, and our decision to maintain high levels of liquidity.
 
A more detailed discussion of the changes in the various components of net income is presented in the following sections of MD&A.

 
24

Table of Contents

Our actions during the third quarter of 2009 continued to be influenced by a weak economy in Hawaii and the U.S. Mainland, as well as the uncertainties regarding the impact of government regulation.  We continued to strengthen our balance sheet in the third quarter of 2009 with increased funding, reserves for credit losses, liquidity and capital.
 
·                 Total deposits were $9.3 billion as of September 30, 2009, an increase of $230.4 million or 3% from June 30, 2009, and an increase of $958.0 million or 12% from December 31, 2008;
·                 Our Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses (the “Allowance”) was $142.7 million as of September 30, 2009, an increase of $5.2 million or 4% from June 30, 2009, and an increase of $19.2 million or 16% from December 31, 2008.  The ratio of our Allowance to total loans and leases outstanding increased to 2.41% as of September 30, 2009, compared to 2.23% as of June 30, 2009, and 1.89% as of December 31, 2008;
·                 As of September 30, 2009, we continued to maintain a significant balance of excess reserves with the Federal Reserve Bank (“FRB”).  We had $401.2 million in excess reserves invested with the FRB as of September 30, 2009, a decrease of $254.8 million or 39% from June 30, 2009, and a decrease of $4.6 million or 1% from December 31, 2008.
·                 We continue to invest excess liquidity conservatively in U.S. Treasury Bills, Notes, and Inflation-Protected Securities, as well as mortgage-backed securities issued by the Government National Mortgage Association;
·                 We continued to increase our capital levels during the third quarter of 2009.  Shareholders’ equity was $902.8 million as of September 30, 2009, an increase of $56.9 million or 7% from June 30, 2009, and an increase of $112.1 million or 14% from December 31, 2008; and
·                 Our Tier 1 capital ratio was 13.43% as of September 30, 2009, compared to 12.56% as of June 30, 2009, and 11.24% as of December 31, 2008.  Our ratio of tangible common equity to risk-weighted assets was 14.56% as of September 30, 2009, compared to 13.02% as of June 30, 2009, and 11.28% as of December 31, 2008.
 
We also reduced our long-term debt by $111.9 million or 55% from December 31, 2008, using our excess liquidity from the growth in our deposit balances to reduce this relatively more expensive source of funds.
 
Our balance sheet is well positioned given the current economic environment.  We continue to meet our near-term objective of maintaining strong liquidity and have substantial resources for sound lending and investment opportunities.

25

 

Table of Contents
 
Table 1 presents our financial highlights for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 and as of September 30, 2009, December 31, 2008, and September 30, 2008.
 
Financial Highlights	 	 	 	Table 1	 	
 	 	           Three Months Ended	 	           Nine Months Ended	 	
 	 	           September 30,	 	           September 30,	 	
(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)	 	2009	 	2008	 	2009	 	2008	 	
For the Period:	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Operating Results	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Net Interest Income	 	$	108,887	 	$	103,575	 	$	308,800	 	$	312,923	 	
Provision for Credit Losses	 	27,500	 	20,358	 	81,077	 	41,957	 	
Total Noninterest Income	 	56,800	 	56,986	 	186,997	 	203,650	 	
Total Noninterest Expense	 	83,987	 	86,790	 	261,504	 	264,084	 	
Net Income	 	36,471	 	47,409	 	103,517	 	152,906	 	
Basic Earnings Per Share	 	0.76	 	1.00	 	2.17	 	3.20	 	
Diluted Earnings Per Share	 	0.76	 	0.99	 	2.16	 	3.17	 	
Dividends Declared Per Share	 	0.45	 	0.44	 	1.35	 	1.32	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Performance Ratios	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Return on Average Assets	 	1.21	%	1.82	%	1.19	%	1.95	%	
Return on Average Shareholders’ Equity	 	16.44	 	24.17	 	16.24	 	26.26	 	
Efficiency Ratio1	 	50.69	 	54.05	 	52.74	 	51.12	 	
Operating Leverage2	 	11.77	 	(12.02	)	(7.21	)	8.65	 	
Net Interest Margin3	 	3.85	 	4.33	 	3.78	 	4.30	 	
Dividend Payout Ratio4	 	59.21	 	44.00	 	62.21	 	41.25	 	
Average Shareholders’ Equity to Average Assets	 	7.34	 	7.55	 	7.34	 	7.41	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Average Balances	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Average Loans and Leases	 	$	6,034,956	 	$	6,512,453	 	$	6,245,117	 	$	6,543,871	 	
Average Assets	 	11,988,995	 	10,339,490	 	11,616,237	 	10,495,367	 	
Average Deposits	 	9,131,064	 	7,772,535	 	9,036,247	 	7,893,972	 	
Average Shareholders’ Equity	 	880,003	 	780,334	 	852,347	 	777,650	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Market Price Per Share of Common Stock	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Closing	 	$	41.54	 	$	53.45	 	$	41.54	 	$	53.45	 	
High	 	42.92	 	70.00	 	45.24	 	70.00	 	
Low	 	33.65	 	37.46	 	25.33	 	37.46	 	
 
 	 	September 30,	 	December 31,	 	September 30,	 	
 	 	2009	 	2008	 	2008	 	
As of Period End:	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Balance Sheet Totals	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Loans and Leases	 	$	5,931,358	 	$	6,530,233	 	$	6,539,458	 	
Total Assets	 	12,208,025	 	10,763,475	 	10,335,047	 	
Total Deposits	 	9,250,100	 	8,292,098	 	7,658,484	 	
Long-Term Debt	 	91,424	 	203,285	 	204,616	 	
Total Shareholders’ Equity	 	902,799	 	790,704	 	780,020	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Asset Quality	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses	 	$	142,658	 	$	123,498	 	$	115,498	 	
Non-Performing Assets5	 	48,536	 	14,949	 	5,927	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Financial Ratios	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Allowance to Loans and Leases Outstanding	 	2.41	%	1.89	%	1.77	%	
Tier 1 Capital Ratio	 	13.43	 	11.24	 	11.14	 	
Total Capital Ratio	 	14.70	 	12.49	 	12.40	 	
Leverage Ratio	 	6.67	 	7.30	 	7.27	 	
Tangible Common Equity to Total Assets6	 	7.11	 	7.01	 	7.20	 	
Tangible Common Equity to Risk-Weighted Assets6	 	14.56	 	11.28	 	11.04	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Non-Financial Data	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Full-Time Equivalent Employees	 	2,474	 	2,581	 	2,573	 	
Branches and Offices	 	85	 	85	 	84	 	
ATMs	 	485	 	462	 	467	 	
 
1	Efficiency ratio is defined as noninterest expense divided by total revenue (net interest income and total noninterest income).	
2	Operating leverage is defined as the percentage change in income before the provision for credit losses and the provision for income taxes. Measures are presented on a linked quarter basis.	
3	Net interest margin is defined as net interest income, on a taxable equivalent basis, as a percentage of average earning assets.	
4	Dividend payout ratio is defined as dividends declared per share divided by basic earnings per share.	
5	Excluded from non-performing assets are non-accrual loans held for sale of $7.7 million as of September 30, 2009.	
6	Tangible common equity, a non-GAAP financial measure, is defined by the Company as shareholders’ equity minus goodwill and intangible assets. Intangible assets are included as a component of other assets in the Consolidated Statements of Condition.	
 
26

Table of Contents
 
Analysis of Statements of Income
 
Average balances, related income and expenses, and resulting yields and rates are presented in Table 2.  An analysis of the change in net interest income, on a taxable equivalent basis, is presented in Table 3.
 
Average Balances and Interest Rates - Taxable Equivalent Basis	 	 	 	Table 2	 	
 	 	Three Months Ended	 	Three Months Ended	 	Nine Months Ended	 	Nine Months Ended	 	
 	 	September 30, 2009	 	September 30, 2008	 	September 30, 2009	 	September 30, 2008	 	
 	 	Average	 	Income/	 	Yield/	 	Average	 	Income/	 	Yield/	 	Average	 	Income/	 	Yield/	 	Average	 	Income/	 	Yield/	 	
(dollars in millions)	 	Balance	 	Expense	 	Rate	 	Balance	 	Expense	 	Rate	 	Balance	 	Expense	 	Rate	 	Balance	 	Expense	 	Rate	 	
Earning Assets	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Interest-Bearing Deposits	 	$	5.1	 	$	—	 	0.28	%	$	6.4	 	$	—	 	2.06	%	$	5.0	 	$	—	 	0.49	%	$	22.2	 	$	0.4	 	2.56	%	
Funds Sold	 	489.7	 	0.3	 	0.26	 	28.4	 	0.1	 	1.96	 	743.7	 	1.4	 	0.25	 	82.6	 	1.6	 	2.47	 	
Investment Securities	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Trading	 	—	 	—	 	—	 	92.6	 	1.2	 	5.07	 	16.1	 	0.6	 	4.92	 	95.3	 	3.5	 	4.96	 	
Available-for-Sale	 	4,491.2	 	46.7	 	4.16	 	2,601.2	 	35.4	 	5.44	 	3,600.8	 	117.8	 	4.36	 	2,627.5	 	105.5	 	5.35	 	
Held-to-Maturity	 	202.0	 	2.2	 	4.31	 	255.4	 	2.9	 	4.50	 	218.9	 	7.1	 	4.33	 	270.1	 	9.1	 	4.51	 	
Loans Held for Sale	 	25.2	 	0.2	 	2.95	 	6.6	 	0.1	 	6.34	 	23.7	 	0.7	 	3.82	 	8.8	 	0.4	 	5.79	 	
Loans and Leases1	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Commercial and Industrial	 	884.4	 	9.0	 	4.06	 	1,049.7	 	13.8	 	5.23	 	966.1	 	29.4	 	4.06	 	1,058.5	 	44.6	 	5.64	 	
Commercial Mortgage	 	787.0	 	10.2	 	5.14	 	695.3	 	10.5	 	6.04	 	760.7	 	29.7	 	5.23	 	669.2	 	31.1	 	6.21	 	
Construction	 	140.9	 	1.4	 	3.81	 	161.4	 	2.3	 	5.67	 	146.5	 	4.4	 	4.02	 	179.4	 	8.2	 	6.09	 	
Commercial Lease Financing	 	464.0	 	3.0	 	2.56	 	472.9	 	0.2	 	0.15	 	459.0	 	10.1	 	2.95	 	473.8	 	8.3	 	2.33	 	
Residential Mortgage	 	2,273.8	 	33.0	 	5.81	 	2,480.7	 	37.6	 	6.05	 	2,356.1	 	104.0	 	5.89	 	2,490.5	 	113.7	 	6.09	 	
Home Equity	 	963.3	 	12.3	 	5.08	 	994.6	 	14.4	 	5.77	 	996.9	 	38.0	 	5.09	 	990.6	 	45.1	 	6.07	 	
Automobile	 	304.5	 	6.1	 	7.88	 	403.6	 	8.2	 	8.09	 	328.6	 	19.5	 	7.93	 	421.7	 	25.7	 	8.14	 	
Other2	 	217.1	 	4.3	 	7.95	 	254.3	 	5.6	 	8.80	 	231.3	 	13.7	 	7.90	 	260.2	 	18.0	 	9.22	 	
Total Loans and Leases	 	6,035.0	 	79.3	 	5.24	 	6,512.5	 	92.6	 	5.67	 	6,245.2	 	248.8	 	5.32	 	6,543.9	 	294.7	 	6.01	 	
Other	 	79.7	 	0.3	 	1.39	 	79.6	 	0.5	 	2.46	 	79.7	 	0.8	 	1.39	 	79.6	 	1.4	 	2.35	 	
Total Earning Assets3	 	11,327.9	 	129.0	 	4.54	 	9,582.7	 	132.8	 	5.53	 	10,933.1	 	377.2	 	4.60	 	9,730.0	 	416.6	 	5.71	 	
Cash and Noninterest-Bearing Deposits	 	203.5	 	 	 	 	 	274.3	 	 	 	 	 	216.8	 	 	 	 	 	280.4	 	 	 	 	 	
Other Assets	 	457.6	 	 	 	 	 	482.5	 	 	 	 	 	466.3	 	 	 	 	 	485.0	 	 	 	 	 	
Total Assets	 	$	11,989.0	 	 	 	 	 	$	10,339.5	 	 	 	 	 	$	11,616.2	 	 	 	 	 	$	10,495.4	 	 	 	 	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Interest-Bearing Liabilities	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Interest-Bearing Deposits	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Demand	 	$	1,625.6	 	0.2	 	0.06	 	$	1,793.0	 	1.5	 	0.32	 	$	1,806.4	 	0.9	 	0.06	 	$	1,635.6	 	4.9	 	0.40	 	
Savings	 	4,190.2	 	6.6	 	0.63	 	2,790.3	 	6.3	 	0.90	 	3,922.4	 	22.6	 	0.77	 	2,802.2	 	22.1	 	1.06	 	
Time	 	1,264.7	 	5.4	 	1.69	 	1,594.8	 	9.9	 	2.48	 	1,364.5	 	20.3	 	1.98	 	1,662.6	 	38.4	 	3.09	 	
Total Interest-Bearing Deposits	 	7,080.5	 	12.2	 	0.69	 	6,178.1	 	17.7	 	1.14	 	7,093.3	 	43.8	 	0.82	 	6,100.4	 	65.4	 	1.43	 	
Short-Term Borrowings	 	18.1	 	—	 	0.12	 	116.7	 	0.5	 	1.74	 	17.7	 	—	 	0.11	 	86.0	 	1.5	 	2.25	 	
Securities Sold Under Agreements to Repurchase	 	1,464.3	 	6.4	 	1.71	 	1,077.4	 	7.7	 	2.80	 	1,191.2	 	19.5	 	2.16	 	1,100.5	 	25.8	 	3.10	 	
Long-Term Debt	 	91.4	 	1.2	 	5.26	 	205.1	 	3.1	 	6.04	 	103.4	 	4.2	 	5.47	 	223.0	 	10.3	 	6.16	 	
Total Interest-Bearing Liabilities	 	8,654.3	 	19.8	 	0.91	 	7,577.3	 	29.0	 	1.52	 	8,405.6	 	67.5	 	1.07	 	7,509.9	 	103.0	 	1.83	 	
Net Interest Income	 	 	 	$	109.2	 	 	 	 	 	$	103.8	 	 	 	 	 	$	309.7	 	 	 	 	 	$	313.6	 	 	 	
Interest Rate Spread	 	 	 	 	 	3.63	%	 	 	 	 	4.01	%	 	 	 	 	3.53	%	 	 	 	 	3.88	%	
Net Interest Margin	 	 	 	 	 	3.85	%	 	 	 	 	4.33	%	 	 	 	 	3.78	%	 	 	 	 	4.30	%	
Noninterest-Bearing Demand Deposits	 	2,050.5	 	 	 	 	 	1,594.4	 	 	 	 	 	1,943.0	 	 	 	 	 	1,793.5	 	 	 	 	 	
Other Liabilities	 	404.2	 	 	 	 	 	387.5	 	 	 	 	 	415.3	 	 	 	 	 	414.3	 	 	 	 	 	
Shareholders’ Equity	 	880.0	 	 	 	 	 	780.3	 	 	 	 	 	852.3	 	 	 	 	 	777.7	 	 	 	 	 	
Total Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity	 	$	11,989.0	 	 	 	 	 	$	10,339.5	 	 	 	 	 	$	11,616.2	 	 	 	 	 	$	10,495.4	 	 	 	 	 	
 
1	Non-performing loans and leases are included in the respective average loan and lease balances. Income, if any, on such loans and leases is recognized on a cash basis.	
2	Comprised of other consumer revolving credit, installment, and consumer lease financing.	
3	Interest income includes taxable equivalent basis adjustments, based upon a federal statutory tax rate of 35%, of $329,000 and $234,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, and $886,000 and $711,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.	
 
27

Table of Contents
 
Analysis of Change in Net Interest Income - Taxable Equivalent Basis	 	Table 3	 	
 	 	Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009	 	
 	 	Compared to September 30, 2008	 	
(dollars in millions)	 	Volume1	 	Rate1	 	Total	 	
Change in Interest Income:	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Interest-Bearing Deposits	 	$	(0.2	)	$	(0.2	)	$	(0.4	)	
Funds Sold	 	2.3	 	(2.5	)	(0.2	)	
Investment Securities	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Trading	 	(2.9	)	—	 	(2.9	)	
Available-for-Sale	 	34.2	 	(21.9	)	12.3	 	
Held-to-Maturity	 	(1.7	)	(0.3	)	(2.0	)	
Loans Held for Sale	 	0.5	 	(0.2	)	0.3	 	
Loans and Leases	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Commercial and Industrial	 	(3.5	)	(11.7	)	(15.2	)	
Commercial Mortgage	 	3.9	 	(5.3	)	(1.4	)	
Construction	 	(1.3	)	(2.5	)	(3.8	)	
Commercial Lease Financing	 	(0.3	)	2.1	 	1.8	 	
Residential Mortgage	 	(6.1	)	(3.6	)	(9.7	)	
Home Equity	 	0.3	 	(7.4	)	(7.1	)	
Automobile	 	(5.6	)	(0.6	)	(6.2	)	
Other2	 	(1.9	)	(2.4	)	(4.3	)	
Total Loans and Leases	 	(14.5	)	(31.4	)	(45.9	)	
Other	 	—	 	(0.6	)	(0.6	)	
Total Change in Interest Income	 	17.7	 	(57.1	)	(39.4	)	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Change in Interest Expense:	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Interest-Bearing Deposits	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Demand	 	0.5	 	(4.5	)	(4.0	)	
Savings	 	7.5	 	(7.0	)	0.5	 	
Time	 	(6.1	)	(12.0	)	(18.1	)	
Total Interest-Bearing Deposits	 	1.9	 	(23.5	)	(21.6	)	
Short-Term Borrowings	 	(0.7	)	(0.8	)	(1.5	)	
Securities Sold Under Agreements to Repurchase	 	2.0	 	(8.3	)	(6.3	)	
Long-Term Debt	 	(5.0	)	(1.1	)	(6.1	)	
Total Change in Interest Expense	 	(1.8	)	(33.7	)	(35.5	)	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Change in Net Interest Income	 	$	19.5	 	$	(23.4	)	$	(3.9	)	
 
1	The changes for each category of interest income and expense are allocated between the portion of changes attributable to the variance in volume and rate for that category.	
2	Comprised of other consumer revolving credit, installment, and consumer lease financing.	
 
28

Table of Contents

Net Interest Income
 
Net interest income is affected by both changes in interest rates (rate) and the amount and composition of earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities (volume).  Net interest margin is calculated as the yield on average earning assets minus the interest rate paid on average interest-bearing liabilities.
 
Due to the uncertainty regarding economic and industry conditions in late 2008 and into 2009, we focused on building and maintaining liquidity.  As government programs and other factors helped to reduce some of the uncertain industry conditions, we invested some of our liquidity into lower risk investment securities.
 
Net interest income, on a taxable equivalent basis, increased by $5.4 million or 5% in the third quarter of 2009 compared to the same period in 2008 primarily due to lower funding costs on our deposit balances.  Net interest income, on a taxable equivalent basis, decreased by $3.9 million or 1% for the first nine months of 2009 compared to the same period in 2008 primarily due to lower yields on our interest-earning assets. Our net interest margin decreased by 48 basis points in the third quarter of 2009 and by 52 basis points for the first nine months of 2009 compared to the same periods in 2008.
 
Yields on our interest-earning assets decreased by 99 basis points in the third quarter of 2009 and by 111 basis points for the first nine months of 2009 compared to the same periods in 2008.  We experienced lower yields in all of our lending categories in 2009, except for commercial leasing, reflecting the effects of a decrease interest rate environment.  Yields on our loan and lease portfolio decreased by 43 basis points in the third quarter of 2009 and by 69 basis points for the first nine months of 2009 compared to the same periods in 2008.  Yields in our commercial lease financing portfolio increased by 241 basis points in the third quarter of 2009 and by 62 basis points for the first nine months of 2009 compared to the same periods in 2008.  This was primarily due to a $4.0 million decrease in lease financing interest income in the third quarter of 2008 as a result of recording the effective settlement of our SILO transactions in September 2008.  We also experienced lower
yields on our investment securities portfolio as a result of the lower interest rate environment in 2009.  Yields on our investment securities available-for-sale decreased by 128 basis points in the third quarter of 2009 and by 99 basis points for the first nine months of 2009 compared to the same periods in 2008.  The lower yields on our interest-earning assets were partially offset by lower funding costs.  Rates paid on our interest-bearing liabilities decreased by 61 basis points in the third quarter of 2009 and by 76 basis points for the first nine months of 2009 compared to the same periods in 2008, reflecting the re-pricing of our liabilities at lower rates.  Rates paid on our interest-bearing deposits decreased by 45 basis points in the third quarter of 2009 and by 61 basis points for the first nine months of 2009 compared to the same periods in 2008.  Also contributing to our lower funding costs was a decrease in rates paid on our securities sold under agreements to repurchase by 109 basis points in the third quarter of 2009 and by 94 basis points for the first nine months of 2009 compared to the same periods in 2008.
 
Average balances of our interest-earning assets increased by $1.7 billion or 18% in the third quarter of 2009 and by $1.2 billion or 12% for the first nine months of 2009 compared to the same periods in 2008, primarily due to a significant increase in investment securities available-for-sale and funds sold.  The deployment of funds in 2009 was made primarily in debt securities issued by the U.S. Treasury and government agencies, and in liquid investments with the FRB.  Partially offsetting the increase in investment securities available-for-sale and funds sold, was a decrease in our average loan and lease balances by $477.5 million or 7% in the third quarter of 2009 and by $298.7 million or 5% for the first nine months of 2009 compared to the same periods in 2008, as we continued to experience pay downs in balances while maintaining our disciplined underwriting approach.  Average interest-bearing deposits increased by $902.4 million or 15% in the third quarter of 2009 and by $992.9 million or 16% for the first nine months of 2009 compared to the same periods in 2008.  The increase in average savings deposit balances from 2008 was primarily due to the continued success of our bonus rate savings and business money market savings products.  The

29

Table of Contents

increase in our average savings deposit balances in 2009 was partially offset by a decrease in average time deposit balances as some customers moved their deposits to more liquid savings and interest-bearing demand products.  Partially offsetting the increase in average interest-bearing deposit balances in 2009 compared to the same periods in 2008 was the decrease in average balances in long-term debt.  This was primarily due to the maturity of $119.3 million in subordinated notes in the first quarter of 2009.
 
Provision for Credit Losses
 
The Provision reflects our judgment of the expense or benefit necessary to achieve the appropriate amount of the Allowance.  We maintain the Allowance at levels adequate to cover our estimate of probable credit losses as of the end of the reporting period.  The Allowance is determined through detailed quarterly analyses of the loan and lease portfolio.  The Allowance is based on our loss experience and changes in the economic environment, as well as an ongoing assessment of our credit quality.  We recorded a Provision of $27.5 million in the third quarter of 2009 compared to a Provision of $20.4 million in the third quarter of 2008.  We recorded a Provision of $81.1 million for the first nine months of 2009 compared to a Provision of $42.0 million for the first nine months of 2008.  The higher Provision recorded in 2009, a result of our quarterly evaluation of the adequacy of the Allowance, was primarily due to increased risk in our mortgage-related consumer lending, commercial and industrial, and commercial real estate portfolios due to continued economic weakness in Hawaii and the U.S. Mainland.  For further discussion on the Allowance, see the “Corporate Risk Profile — Reserve for Credit Losses” section in MD&A.
 
Noninterest Income
 
Noninterest income decreased by $0.2 million or less than 1% in the third quarter of 2009 and by $16.7 million or 8% for the first nine months of 2009 compared to the same periods in 2008.
 
Trust and asset management income decreased by $3.3 million or 23% in third quarter of 2009 compared to the same period in
2008.  This decrease was primarily due to a $2.2 million decrease in mutual fund management fees, which were adversely affected by increases in fee waivers in our money market mutual funds due to low yields, combined with the decline in the value of the equity markets.  Also contributing to the decrease in trust and asset management income was a $0.3 million decrease in employee benefit trust fees, and a $0.2 million decrease each in special service fees and investment management fees.  Trust and asset management income decreased by $10.3 million or 23% for the first nine months of 2009 compared to the same period in 2008, primarily due to a $5.4 million decrease in mutual fund management fees, which were adversely affected by the increases in fee waivers and the decline in the value of the equity markets noted above.  Also contributing to the decrease in trust and asset management income was a $1.0 million decrease in employee benefit trust fees, a $0.8 million decrease in special services fees, a $0.7 million decrease each in agency fees and investment management fees, and a $0.5 million decrease each in testamentary trust fees, and revocable and irrevocable trust fees.  These fees are in large part based upon the market value of the assets that we manage.  Total trust assets under administration were $9.9 billion as of September 30, 2009, $9.8 billion as of December 31, 2008, and $11.3 billion as of September 30, 2008.
 
Mortgage banking income increased by $4.0 million in the third quarter of 2009 compared to the same period in 2008.  This increase was primarily due to higher loan origination volume for the quarter, the result of higher refinancing activity due to lower interest rates on conforming saleable mortgage-based products in the third quarter of 2009 compared to the same period in 2008.  Residential mortgage loan originations were $221.3 million in the third quarter of 2009, a $63.9 million or 41% increase compared to the same period in 2008.  Residential mortgage loan sales were $208.3 million in the third quarter of 2009, a $133.0 million increase compared to the same period in 2008.  Mortgage banking income increased by $11.1 million for the first nine months of 2009 compared to the same period in 2008.  This increase was primarily due to higher loan origination volume for the first nine months of 2009 compared to the same period in 2008.  Residential mortgage loan originations were $1.0 billion for the first

30

Table of Contents

nine months of 2009, a $339.0 million or 50% increase compared to the same period in 2008.  Residential mortgage loan sales were $873.6 million for the first nine months of 2009, a $524.9 million increase compared to the same period in 2008.
 
Service charges on deposit accounts increased by $1.0 million or 7% in the third quarter of 2009 and by $2.8 million or 7% for the first nine months of 2009 compared to the same periods in 2008.  The increases in service charges on deposit accounts from 2008 were primarily due to higher account analysis fees on analyzed business checking accounts as a result of lower earnings credit rates on customer accounts.  This was partially offset by a decrease in monthly service fees resulting from the introduction of our free checking product in July 2008.
 
Fees, exchange, and other service charges decreased by $0.8 million or 5% in the third quarter of 2009 and by $1.9 million or 4% for the first nine months of 2009 compared to the same periods in 2008.  The decrease in the third quarter of 2009 compared to the same period in 2008 was primarily due to lower ATM and credit card fee income.  The decrease for the first nine months of 2009 compared to the same period in 2008 was primarily due to the decrease in ATM fee income as well as lower merchant services income.  This was the result of lower transaction volume during 2009 which was impacted by a slow economy in Hawaii and lower levels of visitor arrivals.
 
Insurance income increased by $1.4 million or 24% in the third quarter of 2009 compared to the same period in 2008.  This increase was primarily due to a $2.6 million increase in contingent commission income, partially offset by a $0.9 million decrease in commission and brokerage income and a $0.2 million decrease in income from annuity and life insurance products.  Insurance income decreased by $0.9 million or 5% for the first nine months of 2009 compared to the same period in 2008.  This decrease was primarily due to a $1.6 million decrease in commission and brokerage income and a $1.0 million decrease in income from annuity and life insurance products.  This was partially offset by a $1.8 million increase in contingent commission income.
In June 2009, we sold our retail insurance brokerage operation, Bank of Hawaii Insurance Services, Inc. to a third party and recognized a pre-tax gain of $0.9 million.  This sale primarily explains the decline in commission and brokerage income during the third quarter of 2009.  As of September 30, 2009, we continued to operate our wholesale insurance business, Triad Insurance Agency, Inc. (“Triad”).  On October 9, 2009, we signed an agreement to sell certain assets of Triad to a third party.  The sale of Triad closed on October 22, 2009 and resulted in pre-tax gains of approximately $1.5 million that will be recorded in the fourth quarter of 2009.
 
Other noninterest income decreased by $2.3 million or 31% in the third quarter of 2009 compared to the same period in 2008.  This decrease was primarily due to a $0.7 million decrease each in income from bank-owned life insurance, our customer-related interest rate swap program, and in the unrealized gains related to our subordinated notes recorded in the third quarter of 2008.  Other noninterest income decreased by $17.0 million or 36% for the first nine months of 2009 compared to the same period in 2008.  This decrease was primarily due to pre-tax gains of $13.7 million recorded in the first quarter of 2008 resulting from the mandatory redemption of our Visa shares.  Also contributing to the decrease in other income was $2.0 million in unrealized gains related to our subordinated notes recorded in 2008.

31

Table of Contents

Noninterest Expense
 
Noninterest expense decreased by $2.8 million or 3% in the third quarter of 2009 and by $2.6 million or 1% for the first nine months of 2009 compared to the same periods in 2008.
Table 4 presents the components of salaries and benefits expense for the third quarter and first nine months of 2009 and 2008.

Salaries and Benefits	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	Table 4	 	
 	 	 	Three Months Ended	 	 	Nine Months Ended	 	
 	 	 	September 30,	 	 	September 30,	 	
(dollars in thousands)	 	2009	 	2008	 	2009	 	2008	 	
Salaries	 	$	29,988	 	$	30,190	 	$	90,565	 	$	89,112	 	
Incentive Compensation	 	5,524	 	5,969	 	12,223	 	16,358	 	
Share-Based Compensation and Cash Grants
for the Purchase of Company Stock	 	595	 	1,180	 	1,986	 	8,592	 	
Commission Expense	 	1,523	 	1,653	 	5,528	 	5,518	 	
Retirement and Other Benefits	 	3,962	 	3,097	 	12,385	 	11,822	 	
Payroll Taxes	 	2,176	 	2,162	 	8,020	 	8,067	 	
Medical, Dental, and Life Insurance	 	2,619	 	2,452	 	6,519	 	7,421	 	
Separation Expense	 	—	 	61	 	369	 	1,331	 	
Total Salaries and Benefits	 	$	46,387	 	$	46,764	 	$	137,595	 	$	148,221	 	

Salaries and benefits expense decreased by $0.4 million or less than 1% in the third quarter of 2009 compared to the same period in 2008.  Salaries and benefits expense decreased by $10.6 million or 7% for the first nine months of 2009 compared to the same period in 2008.  This decrease was primarily due to a $6.6 million decrease in share-based compensation and cash grants for the purchase of Company stock, as well as a $4.1 million decrease in incentive compensation expense, reflecting lower levels of profitability.
 
Net occupancy expense decreased by $1.4 million or 12% in the third quarter of 2009 and by $2.9 million or 9% for the first nine months of 2009 compared to the same periods in 2008.  The decrease in net occupancy expense in the third quarter of 2009 was primarily due to a $0.7 million decrease in utilities expense and a $0.3 million decrease in depreciation and amortization expense.  The decrease in net occupancy expense for the first nine months of 2009 was primarily due to a $1.3 million decrease in utilities expense and a $0.7 million decrease in depreciation and amortization expense.
 
Professional fees decreased by $0.6 million or 19% in the third quarter of 2009.  This decrease was primarily due to lower expenses incurred in our Investment Services segment.  Professional fees increased by $0.7 million or 9% for the first nine months of 2009 compared to the same period in 2008.  This increase was due to a $0.7 million increase in legal fees.
 
FDIC insurance expense increased by $3.0 million in the third quarter of 2009 and by $13.3 million for the first nine months of 2009 compared to the same periods in 2008.  The increase in FDIC insurance expense in the third quarter and the first nine months of 2009 was primarily due to higher deposit balances, higher assessment rates, and our participation in the Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program.  The increase in FDIC insurance expense for the first nine months of 2009 was also due in part to the Company’s $5.7 million share of an industry-wide assessment by the FDIC which was recorded in the second quarter of 2009.  In 2008 and into 2009, we utilized credits from the Federal Deposit Insurance Reform Act of 2005 which were available to offset our deposit insurance assessments.  We fully utilized these credits in March 2009.

32

Table of Contents

Other noninterest expense decreased by $3.0 million or 15% in the third quarter of 2009 compared to the same period in 2008.  This decrease was primarily due to:
 
·                 $0.6 million decrease in operational losses;
·                 $0.4 million decrease in each of the categories of business development and travel, unrealized gains related to deferred compensation arrangements, and data services;
·                 $0.3 million decrease in advertising expense; and
·                 $0.1 million decrease in each of the categories of dealer reserve, education and recruitment, telephone, delivery and postage, and other taxes.
 
Other noninterest expense decreased by $2.8 million or 5% for the first nine months of 2009 compared to the same period in 2008.  This decrease was primarily due to:
 
·                 $2.3 million reduction in contributions to the Bank of Hawaii Charitable Foundation;
·                 $1.7 million decrease in our reserves for legal contingencies;
·                 $1.1 million decrease in business development and travel expense;
·                 $1.0 million expense related to a call premium on our Capital Securities recorded in 2008;
·                 $0.8 million decrease in delivery and postage services;
·                 $0.7 million decrease in each of the categories of advertising and unrealized gains related to deferred compensation arrangements;
·                 $0.5 million decrease in education and recruitment; and
·                 $0.4 million decrease in each of the categories of data services, and merchant transaction and card processing fees.
 
These decreases in other noninterest expense for the first nine months of 2009 compared to the same period in 2008 were partially offset by:
 
·                 $5.6 million reversal of contingency accruals related to Visa legal matters recorded in the first quarter of 2008; and
·                 $0.9 million premium related to the early repayment of our privately placed notes recorded in the first quarter of 2009.

33

 

Table of Contents
 
Provision for Income Taxes
 
Table 5 presents our provision for income taxes and effective tax rates for the third quarter and first nine months of 2009 and 2008.
 
Provision for Income Taxes and Effective Tax Rates	 	 	 	 	 	Table 5	 	
 	 	Three Months Ended	 	Nine Months Ended	 	
 	 	September 30,	 	September 30,	 	
(dollars in thousands)	 	2009    	2008    	2009    	2008  	
Provision for Income Taxes	 	$	17,729	 	$	6,004	 	$	49,699	 	$	57,626	 	
Effective Tax Rates	 	32.71	%	11.24	%	32.44	%	27.37	%	

The lower effective tax rate for the third quarter of 2008 compared to the same period in 2009 was primarily due to the effective settlement of our SILO transactions recorded in September 2008, which resulted in a $12.9 million credit to the provision for income taxes in September 2008.
 
The lower effective tax rate for the first nine months of 2008 compared to the same period in 2009 was primarily due to the effective settlement of our SILO transactions.  Also contributing to the lower effective tax rate for the first nine months of 2008 was the tax effects related to the sale of our equity interest in an aircraft leveraged lease in March 2008.  The pre-tax gain from the aircraft sale would have resulted in an income tax expense of approximately $4.6 million based on statutory income tax rates.  However, due to the timing of the sale and the adjustment of previously recognized income tax liabilities, this transaction resulted in a $1.4 million income tax benefit.  As a result, the total income tax benefit from this transaction was approximately $6.0 million.
 
Analysis of Statements of Condition
 
Investment Securities
 
The carrying value of our investment securities, excluding trading securities, was $5.0 billion as of September 30, 2009, and $2.8 billion as of December 31, 2008 and September 30, 2008.  The increase in the carrying value of our investment securities during 2009 was primarily due to investments made
in debt securities issued by the U.S. Treasury and mortgage-backed securities issued by government agencies.  These investments in high grade securities with relatively short durations, allow us to maintain flexibility to redeploy funds should such opportunities arise.
 
Gross unrealized losses on our temporarily impaired investment securities were $15.1 million as of September 30, 2009, $47.4 million as of December 31, 2008, and $40.1 million as of September 30, 2008.  Gross unrealized losses related to our temporarily impaired investment securities decreased from December 31, 2008 and September 30, 2008 primarily due to favorable movements in market interest rates as well as the sale of several private-label mortgage-backed securities which had recovered to their amortized cost bases in 2009.
 
As of September 30, 2009, we did not own any subordinated debt, or preferred or common stock of the Federal National Mortgage Association or the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation.  Table 6 presents the par value, amortized cost, and fair value of our debt and mortgage-backed securities issued by the Federal National Mortgage Association and the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation as of September 30, 2009.  As of September 30, 2009, we owned private-label mortgage-backed securities with an estimated fair value of $81.4 million.  See Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for more information.

34

Table of Contents
 
Investment Securities Issued by the Federal National Mortgage Association	 	 	 	
and the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation	 	 	 	 	 	Table 6	 	
(dollars in thousands)	 	Par Value	 	Amortized Cost	 	Fair Value	 	
September 30, 2009	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Debt Securities Issued by U.S. Government-Sponsored Enterprises	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Federal National Mortgage Association	 	$	250	 	$	252	 	$	267	 	
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation	 	500	 	499	 	535	 	
Subtotal	 	750	 	751	 	802	 	
Mortgage-Backed Securities Issued by U.S. Government-Sponsored Enterprises	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Federal National Mortgage Association	 	686,560	 	687,621	 	718,506	 	
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation	 	589,951	 	590,099	 	616,419	 	
Subtotal	 	1,276,511	 	1,277,720	 	1,334,925	 	
Total	 	$	1,277,261	 	$	1,278,471	 	$	1,335,727	 	
 
Loans and Leases
 
Table 7 presents the composition of our loan and lease portfolio by major categories.
 
Loan and Lease Portfolio Balances	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	Table 7	 	
 	 	September 30,	 	June 30,	 	March 31,	 	December 31,	 	September 30,	 	
(dollars in thousands)	 	2009	 	2009	 	2009	 	2008	 	2008	 	
Commercial	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Commercial and Industrial	 	$	845,056	 	$	932,444	 	$	1,000,640	 	$	1,053,781	 	$	1,077,314	 	
Commercial Mortgage	 	777,498	 	788,226	 	726,193	 	740,779	 	708,961	 	
Construction	 	137,414	 	140,455	 	153,754	 	153,952	 	153,364	 	
Lease Financing	 	458,696	 	468,030	 	454,822	 	468,140	 	467,279	 	
Total Commercial	 	2,218,664	 	2,329,155	 	2,335,409	 	2,416,652	 	2,406,918	 	
Consumer	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Residential Mortgage	 	2,246,729	 	2,309,971	 	2,402,061	 	2,461,824	 	2,478,925	 	
Home Equity	 	952,076	 	977,632	 	1,016,381	 	1,033,221	 	1,004,437	 	
Automobile	 	299,657	 	309,877	 	343,642	 	369,789	 	395,015	 	
Other1	 	214,232	 	223,276	 	241,233	 	248,747	 	254,163	 	
Total Consumer	 	3,712,694	 	3,820,756	 	4,003,317	 	4,113,581	 	4,132,540	 	
Total Loans and Leases	 	$	5,931,358	 	$	6,149,911	 	$	6,338,726	 	$	6,530,233	 	$	6,539,458	 	
 
1 Comprised of other revolving credit, installment, and lease financing.

Loans and leases represent our largest category of interest earning assets and the largest source of interest income.  Total loans and leases as of September 30, 2009 decreased by $598.9 million or 9% from December 31, 2008 and decreased by $608.1 million or 9% from September 30, 2008.
 
Commercial loans and leases as of September 30, 2009 decreased by $198.0 million or 8% from December 31, 2008 and decreased by $188.3 million or 8% from September 30, 2008.  The decrease in our commercial and industrial lending portfolio was primarily due to continued payoffs by corporate national customers.  The decrease in our construction lending portfolio was consistent with the slow economy in Hawaii.  This was partially offset by an increase in our commercial
mortgage portfolio primarily due to one new commercial credit added in the second quarter of 2009.  While we continue to lend to credit worthy customers, we remain cautious in our lending approach in the current economic environment.  Consumer loans and leases as of September 30, 2009 decreased by $400.9 million or 10% from December 31, 2008 and decreased by $419.8 million or 10% from September 30, 2008.  We continued to experience higher levels of refinancing activity in the third quarter of 2009, albeit at lower levels compared to the second quarter of 2009, as a result of lower interest rates on mortgage-based products.  Balances in other consumer loan categories have decreased as a result of reduced customer demand in a slow economy in Hawaii as well as our disciplined underwriting approach.

35

Table of Contents

Table 8 presents the composition of our loan and lease portfolio by geographic area and by major categories.

Geographic Distribution of Loan and Lease Portfolio	 	Table 8	 	
 	 	September 30,	 	June 30,	 	March 31,	 	December 31,	 	September 30,	 	
(dollars in thousands)	 	2009	 	2009	 	2009	 	2008	 	2008	 	
Commercial	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Hawaii	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Commercial and Industrial	 	$	649,686	 	$	685,333	 	$	661,733	 	$	707,433	 	$	697,426	 	
Commercial Mortgage	 	701,712	 	701,135	 	640,224	 	646,280	 	628,732	 	
Construction	 	133,668	 	134,638	 	146,258	 	145,208	 	142,719	 	
Lease Financing	 	43,079	 	45,507	 	50,311	 	50,622	 	50,294	 	
U.S. Mainland1	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Commercial and Industrial	 	121,495	 	171,062	 	232,772	 	228,149	 	242,642	 	
Commercial Mortgage	 	4,050	 	14,086	 	14,210	 	14,405	 	4,695	 	
Construction	 	3,746	 	5,817	 	6,220	 	6,438	 	8,655	 	
Lease Financing	 	378,605	 	385,064	 	372,008	 	385,181	 	387,160	 	
Guam	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Commercial and Industrial	 	62,599	 	64,151	 	73,595	 	77,507	 	78,700	 	
Commercial Mortgage	 	68,205	 	69,667	 	70,056	 	78,291	 	73,240	 	
Construction	 	—	 	—	 	1,276	 	2,306	 	1,990	 	
Lease Financing	 	17,848	 	18,293	 	14,479	 	13,181	 	10,962	 	
Other Pacific Islands	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Commercial and Industrial	 	7,557	 	8,470	 	9,343	 	12,177	 	14,660	 	
Commercial Mortgage	 	1,409	 	1,510	 	1,609	 	1,703	 	2,188	 	
Foreign2	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Commercial and Industrial	 	3,719	 	3,428	 	23,197	 	28,515	 	43,886	 	
Commercial Mortgage	 	2,122	 	1,828	 	94	 	100	 	106	 	
Lease Financing	 	19,164	 	19,166	 	18,024	 	19,156	 	18,863	 	
Total Commercial	 	2,218,664	 	2,329,155	 	2,335,409	 	2,416,652	 	2,406,918	 	
Consumer	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Hawaii	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Residential Mortgage	 	2,046,966	 	2,103,104	 	2,189,237	 	2,242,637	 	2,255,970	 	
Home Equity	 	908,051	 	931,010	 	967,570	 	982,379	 	953,078	 	
Automobile	 	216,843	 	219,346	 	239,960	 	256,131	 	271,568	 	
Other3	 	163,092	 	167,695	 	181,102	 	185,479	 	189,417	 	
U.S. Mainland1	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Home Equity	 	21,093	 	23,222	 	25,876	 	28,034	 	29,473	 	
Automobile	 	32,675	 	36,302	 	41,785	 	45,559	 	48,631	 	
Guam	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Residential Mortgage	 	192,078	 	198,941	 	204,902	 	210,987	 	214,748	 	
Home Equity	 	19,884	 	20,223	 	19,726	 	19,546	 	18,625	 	
Automobile	 	46,095	 	49,799	 	56,665	 	61,907	 	67,600	 	
Other3	 	25,639	 	27,475	 	29,518	 	30,992	 	31,961	 	
Other Pacific Islands	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Residential Mortgage	 	7,685	 	7,926	 	7,922	 	8,200	 	8,207	 	
Home Equity	 	3,048	 	3,177	 	3,209	 	3,262	 	3,261	 	
Automobile	 	4,044	 	4,430	 	5,232	 	6,192	 	7,216	 	
Other3	 	25,497	 	28,096	 	30,609	 	32,271	 	32,780	 	
Foreign2	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Other3	 	4	 	10	 	4	 	5	 	5	 	
Total Consumer	 	3,712,694	 	3,820,756	 	4,003,317	 	4,113,581	 	4,132,540	 	
Total Loans and Leases	 	$	5,931,358	 	$	6,149,911	 	$	6,338,726	 	$	6,530,233	 	$	6,539,458	 	
 
1  For secured loans and leases, classification as U.S. Mainland is made based on where the collateral is located.  For unsecured loans and leases, classification as U.S. Mainland is made based on the location where the majority of the borrower’s business operations are conducted.
2  Loans classified as Foreign represent those which are recorded in the Company’s international business units. Lease financing classified as Foreign represent those with air transportation carriers based outside the United States.
3  Comprised of other revolving credit, installment, and lease financing.
 
36

Table of Contents

Our commercial and consumer lending activities are concentrated primarily in Hawaii and the Pacific Islands.  Our commercial loan and lease portfolio to borrowers based on the U.S. Mainland includes participation in shared national credits and leveraged lease financing.  Our consumer loan and lease portfolio includes limited lending activities on the U.S. Mainland.
Other Assets
 
Table 9 presents the major components of other assets as of September 30, 2009, December 31, 2008, and September 30, 2008.

 
Other Assets	 	 	 	 	 	Table 9	 	
 	 	September 30,	 	December 31,	 	September 30,	 	
(dollars in thousands)	 	2009	 	2008	 	2008	 	
Bank-Owned Life Insurance	 	$	200,986	 	$	196,043	 	$	194,420	 	
Federal and State Tax Deposits	 	82,500	 	82,500	 	82,500	 	
Federal Home Loan Bank and Federal Reserve Bank Stock	 	79,723	 	79,705	 	79,635	 	
Low-Income Housing and Other Equity Investments	 	27,146	 	30,920	 	31,945	 	
Derivative Financial Instruments	 	25,786	 	38,870	 	10,232	 	
Accounts Receivable	 	16,109	 	17,607	 	19,461	 	
Other	 	32,387	 	28,922	 	42,594	 	
Total Other Assets	 	$	464,637	 	$	474,567	 	$	460,787	 	

Other assets as of September 30, 2009 decreased by $9.9 million or 2% from December 31, 2008.  The decrease in other assets from December 31, 2008 was primarily due to a $10.5 million decrease in the estimated fair value of our customer-related interest rate swap accounts, which have off-setting amounts recorded in other liabilities.  Also contributing to the decrease in total other assets was a $3.8 million decrease in low-income housing and other equity investments primarily due to amortization of these investments recorded over this period.  This was partially offset by a $4.9 million increase in bank-owned life insurance.
 
Other assets as of September 30, 2009 increased by $3.8 million or less than 1% from September 30, 2008.  The increase in total other assets from September 30, 2008 was primarily due to a $15.1 million increase in the estimated fair
value of our customer-related interest rate swap accounts, partially offset by a $6.5 million decrease in receivable balances related to the sale of investment securities which were in the process of settlement as of period end, and a $4.8 million decrease in low-income housing and other equity investments.
 
As of September 30, 2009, the carrying value of our Federal Home Loan Bank of Seattle (“FHLB”) stock was $61.3 million.  Management expects the Company to remain a member institution of the FHLB and believes that there is no impairment related to the carrying amount of the Company’s FHLB stock as of September 30, 2009.  See Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for information related to our accounting and impairment policy.

37

Table of Contents
 
Deposits
 
Table 10 presents the composition of our deposits by major customer categories.
 
Deposits	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	Table 10	 	
 	 	September 30,	 	June 30,	 	March 31,	 	December 31,	 	September 30,	 	
(dollars in thousands)	 	2009	 	2009	 	2009	 	2008	 	2008	 	
Consumer	 	$	4,776,626	 	$	4,747,612	 	$	4,702,494	 	$	4,593,248	 	$	4,460,965	 	
Commercial	 	4,002,068	 	3,828,521	 	3,645,842	 	3,221,668	 	2,835,699	 	
Public and Other	 	471,406	 	443,528	 	864,455	 	477,182	 	361,820	 	
Total Deposits	 	$	9,250,100	 	$	9,019,661	 	$	9,212,791	 	$	8,292,098	 	$	7,658,484	 	

Deposit balances as of September 30, 2009 increased by $958.0 million or 12% from December 31, 2008.  The increase was primarily due to an $835.1 million increase in our business money market savings accounts and a $406.7 million increase in our bonus rate savings products.  This was partially offset by a $154.6 million decrease in public interest-bearing demand accounts and a $119.6 million decrease in business time deposits of $100,000 or more.
 
Deposit balances as of September 30, 2009 increased by $1.6 billion or 21% from September 30, 2008.  The increase was primarily due to a $1.0 billion increase in our business money market savings accounts, a $484.0 million increase in our bonus rate savings products, and a $301.5 million increase in our analyzed business checking accounts.  This was partially offset by a $162.5 million decrease in business time deposits of $100,000 or more.

Table 11 presents the composition of our savings deposits.
 
Savings Deposits	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	Table 11	 	
 	 	September 30,	 	June 30,	 	March 31,	 	December 31,	 	September 30,	 	
(dollars in thousands)	 	2009	 	2009	 	2009	 	2008	 	2008	 	
Money Market	 	$	2,008,094	 	$	1,769,023	 	$	1,607,375	 	$	1,173,132	 	$	965,149	 	
Regular Savings	 	2,357,163	 	2,285,016	 	2,298,334	 	1,931,731	 	1,815,649	 	
Total Savings Deposits	 	$	4,365,257	 	$	4,054,039	 	$	3,905,709	 	$	3,104,863	 	$	2,780,798	 	
 
Table 12 presents our quarterly average balance of time deposits of $100,000 or more.
 
Average Time Deposits of $100,000 or More	 	 	 	Table 12	 	
 	 	Three Months Ended	 	
 	 	September 30,	 	June 30,	 	March 31,	 	December 31,	 	September 30,	 	
(dollars in thousands)	 	2009	 	2009	 	2009	 	2008	 	2008	 	
Average Time Deposits	 	$	709,323	 	$	738,488	 	$	851,582	 	$	891,922	 	$	934,845	 	

Borrowings and Long-Term Debt
 
Borrowings consisted of funds purchased and short-term borrowings, including commercial paper.  Borrowings were $15.9 million as of September 30, 2009, a $4.8 million or 23% decrease from December 31, 2008, and a $184.5 million or 92% decrease from September 30, 2008.  We manage the level of our borrowings to provide adequate sources of liquidity. 
Due to our high level of deposits and increased capital levels,
we reduced the level of borrowings as a source of funds.
Long-term debt was $91.4 million as of September 30, 2009, a $111.9 million or 55% decrease from December 31, 2008, and a $113.2 million or 55% decrease from September 30, 2008.  The decrease in long-term debt from December 31, 2008 and September 30, 2008 was primarily due to the repayment of $119.0 million in subordinated notes and $25.0 million in privately placed notes in the first quarter of 2009.  This was

38

Table of Contents

partially offset by the recognition of $32.4 million in non-recourse debt on our balance sheet in the second quarter of 2009, which was previously not recognized as an obligation of the Company under leveraged lease accounting treatment.  See Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for more information on this leasing transaction.
Securities Sold Under Agreements to Repurchase
 
Table 13 presents the composition of our securities sold under agreements to repurchase as of September 30, 2009, December 31, 2008, and September 30, 2008.

Securities Sold Under Agreements to Repurchase	 	 	 	 	 	Table 13	 	
 	 	September 30,	 	December 31,	 	September 30,	 	
(dollars in thousands)	 	2009	 	2008	 	2008	 	
Government Entities	 	$	849,755	 	$	353,835	 	$	434,431	 	
Private Entities	 	675,000	 	675,000	 	675,000	 	
Total Securities Sold Under Agreements to Repurchase	 	$	1,524,755	 	$	1,028,835	 	$	1,109,431	 	

As of September 30, 2009, the increase in securities sold under agreements to repurchase from 2008 was primarily due to new placements to accommodate local government entities.  A portion of the increase in securities sold under agreements to repurchase resulted from the withdrawal of public interest-bearing demand deposits in the second quarter of 2009.  As of September 30, 2009, the weighted average maturity was 32 days for our securities sold under agreements to repurchase with government entities and 7.54 years for securities sold under agreements to repurchase with private institutions, subject to the private institutions’ right to terminate agreements at earlier specified dates which could decrease the weighted average maturity to 264 days.  As of September 30, 2009, $150.0 million of our securities sold under agreements to repurchase placed with private institutions were indexed to the London Inter Bank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) with the remaining $525.0 million at fixed interest rates.  If the agreements indexed to LIBOR with private institutions are not terminated by specified dates, the interest rates on the agreements become fixed, at rates ranging from 4.25% to 5.00%, for the remaining term of the respective agreements.  As of September 30, 2009, the weighted average interest rate for outstanding agreements with private institutions was 3.46%.
Shareholders’ Equity
 
As of September 30, 2009, shareholders’ equity was $902.8 million, an increase of $112.1 million or 14% from December 31, 2008, and an increase of $122.8 million or 16% from September 30, 2008.  The increase in shareholders’ equity from December 31, 2008 was primarily due to earnings for the first nine months of 2009 of $103.5 million and changes in the fair value of our investment securities available-for-sale, net of tax, of $65.1 million.  The change in fair value of our investment securities available-for-sale, net of tax, was primarily due to favorable interest rate movements and the larger investment portfolio as of September 30, 2009.  This was partially offset by cash dividends paid of $64.6 million.  Consistent with our strategy to build capital levels, we have not repurchased shares of our common stock in 2009.  Further discussion on our capital structure is included in the “Corporate Risk Profile — Capital Management” section of MD&A.

39

Table of Contents

Analysis of Business Segments
 
Our business segments are Retail Banking, Commercial Banking, Investment Services, and Treasury.  Our management accounting process measures the performance of the business segments based on the management structure of the Company.  This process uses various techniques to assign balance sheet and income statement amounts to the business segments, including allocations of income, expense, the Provision, and capital.  This process is dynamic and requires certain allocations based on judgment and other subjective factors.  Unlike financial accounting, there is no comprehensive, authoritative guidance for management accounting that is equivalent to U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”).  We use this management accounting process to assess business segment performance and to allocate resources.
 
The net interest income of the business segments reflects the results of a funds transfer pricing process that matches assets and liabilities with similar interest rate sensitivity and maturity characteristics and reflects the allocation of net interest income related to our overall asset and liability management activities on a proportionate basis.  The basis for the allocation of net interest income is a function of our assumptions that are subject to change based on changes in current interest rates and market conditions.  Funds transfer pricing also serves to transfer interest rate risk to Treasury.  However, the other business segments have some latitude to retain certain interest rate exposures related to customer pricing decisions within guidelines.  See Note 5 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for selected financial information as of and for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008.
 
Retail Banking
 
Retail Banking offers a broad range of financial products and services to consumers and small businesses.  Loan and lease products include residential mortgage loans, home equity lines
of credit, automobile loans and leases, and installment loans.  Deposit products include checking, savings, and time deposit accounts.  Products and services from Retail Banking are delivered to customers through 73 Hawaii branch locations, 485 ATMs throughout Hawaii and the Pacific Islands, e-Bankoh (on-line banking service), a 24-hour customer service center, and a mobile banking service.
 
Net income decreased by $9.3 million or 41% in the third quarter of 2009 compared to the same period in 2008 primarily due to an increase in the Provision and a decrease in net interest income.  This was partially offset by an increase in noninterest income.   The $8.2 million increase in the Provision was primarily due to higher net charge-offs of loans in the segment’s home equity and residential mortgage portfolios.  The $7.5 million decrease in net interest income was primarily due to lower earnings credits on the segment’s deposit portfolio, partially offset by higher average deposit balances.  The $0.7 million increase in noninterest income was primarily due to higher mortgage banking income, a result of higher origination and sale activity.
 
Net income decreased by $25.5 million or 36% for the first nine months of 2009 compared to the same period in 2008. The decrease in net income was primarily due to an increase in the Provision and noninterest expense, along with a decrease in net interest income.  This was partially offset by an increase in noninterest income.  The $23.5 million increase in the Provision was primarily due to higher net charge-offs of loans in the segment’s home equity and residential mortgage portfolios.  The $19.2 million decrease in net interest income was primarily due to lower earnings credits on the segment’s deposit portfolio, partially offset by higher average deposit balances.  The $3.4 million increase in noninterest expense was primarily due to higher FDIC base insurance assessments.  The $5.7 million increase in noninterest income was primarily due to higher mortgage banking income, a result of higher origination and sale activity.

40

 

Table of Contents

Commercial Banking
 
Commercial Banking offers products including corporate banking, commercial real estate loans, commercial lease financing, auto dealer financing, deposit and cash management products, merchant services to its small business customers, and wholesale/retail property and casualty insurance products.  Commercial lending, deposit, and cash management services are offered to middle-market and large companies in Hawaii.  Commercial real estate mortgages focus on customers that include investors, developers, and builders domiciled in Hawaii.  Commercial Banking also includes syndicated lending activities, international banking, and operations at our 12 branches in the Pacific Islands.
 
Net income increased by $6.5 million or 142% in the third quarter of 2009 compared to the same period of 2008 primarily due to increases in net interest income and noninterest income.  The $6.4 million increase in net interest income was primarily due to higher average deposit balances and the effective settlement of our SILO transactions in 2008.  The $1.3 million increase in noninterest income was primarily due to higher contingent fee income on our wholesale and casualty property insurance products.
 
Net income decreased by $3.7 million or 9% for the first nine months of 2009 compared to the same period in 2008 primarily due to increases in the Provision and noninterest expense, partially offset by increases in net interest income and noninterest income.  The $14.6 million increase in the Provision was primarily due to higher net charge-offs of loans and leases in the segment.  The $3.1 million increase in noninterest expense was primarily due to higher FDIC base insurance assessments as well as our share of an industry-wide assessment by the FDIC.  The $6.2 million increase in net interest income was primarily due to higher average deposit balances and lower leveraged lease financing income in 2008.  The $2.6 million increase in noninterest income was primarily due to higher account analysis fees as a result of lower earnings credit rates on customer accounts.
Investment Services
 
Investment Services includes private banking, trust services, asset management, and institutional investment advisory services.  A significant portion of this segment’s income is derived from fees, which are generally based on the market values of assets under management.  The private banking and personal trust group assists individuals and families in building and preserving their wealth by providing investment, credit, and trust services to high-net-worth individuals.  The asset management group manages portfolios and creates investment products.  Institutional sales and service offers investment advice to corporations, government entities, and foundations.  This segment also provides a full service brokerage offering equities, mutual funds, life insurance, and annuity products.
 
Net income decreased by $0.1 million or 5% in the third quarter of 2009 compared to the same period in 2008 primarily due to a decrease in noninterest income, partially offset by decreases in noninterest expense and the Provision.  The $3.4 million decrease in noninterest income was primarily due to lower fee income as a result of lower asset values under trust administration.  The $1.1 million decrease in the Provision was due to lower net charge-offs of loans in this segment.  The $1.8 million decrease in noninterest expense was primarily due to lower salaries, other operating, and allocated expenses.
 
Net income decreased by $5.4 million or 56% for the first nine months of 2009 compared to the same period in 2008 primarily due to a decrease in noninterest income, partially offset by a decrease in noninterest expense.  The $11.7 million decrease in noninterest income was primarily due to lower fee income as a result of lower asset values under trust administration.  The $2.7 million decrease in noninterest expense was primarily due to lower salaries and allocated expenses.

41

Table of Contents

Treasury
 
Treasury consists of corporate asset and liability management activities, including interest rate risk management and a foreign exchange business.  This segment’s assets and liabilities (and related interest income and expense) consist of interest-bearing deposits, investment securities, federal funds sold and purchased, government deposits, and short and long-term borrowings.  The primary sources of noninterest income are from bank-owned life insurance and foreign exchange income related to customer driven currency requests from merchants and island visitors.  The net residual effect of the transfer pricing of assets and liabilities is included in this segment, along with eliminations of inter-company transactions.
 
Net income decreased by $8.0 million or 45% in the third quarter 2009 compared to the same period in 2008 primarily due to a higher provision for income taxes.   This was partially offset by higher net interest income and noninterest income.  The $16.0 million increase in the provision for income taxes was primarily due a to the tax benefit from a $12.9 million credit related to the effective settlement of our SILO transactions in the third quarter 2008.  The $6.1 million increase in net interest income was primarily due to the increase in the balance of our investment securities portfolio as well as reductions in long-term debt and securities sold under agreements to repurchase.  The $1.2 million increase in noninterest income was primarily due to the net change in the estimated fair value of our mortgage servicing rights due to changes in valuation assumptions and the fair value of our designated trading securities.
Net income decreased by $14.8 million or 48% for the first nine months of 2009 compared to the same period in 2008 primarily due to higher provision for taxes and lower noninterest income.  This was partially offset by higher net interest income and lower noninterest expense.  The $15.3 million increase in the provision for income taxes was primarily due to the tax benefit from the $12.9 million credit related to our SILO transactions in the third quarter 2008.  The $13.3 million decrease in noninterest income was primarily due to a $13.7 million pre-tax gain from the mandatory redemption of our Visa shares in the first quarter of 2008 and unrealized gains from our subordinated notes in the second quarter of 2008.  The $6.4 million decrease in noninterest expense was primarily due to various accruals recorded in the first quarter of 2008 (e.g., cash awards to purchase our stock and earnings-based incentive compensation) and lower separation expense.  The $8.0 million increase in net interest income was primarily due to the increase in the balance of the investment portfolio and reductions in long-term debt and securities sold under agreements to repurchase.
 
Other organizational units (Technology, Operations, Marketing, Human Resources, Finance, Credit and Risk Management, Corporate Services Group, and Corporate and Regulatory Administration) included in Treasury provide a wide-range of support to our other income earning segments.  Expenses incurred by these support units are charged to the business segments through an internal cost allocation process.

42

 

Table of Contents
 
Corporate Risk Profile
 
Credit Risk
 
Our overall credit risk position is reflective of the continued weak economic activity during the third quarter of 2009, with increasing levels of non-performing assets compared to December 31, 2008.  Although the decline in visitor arrivals appears to be stabilizing, visitor spending continues to be lower in 2009 compared to 2008.  The construction and real estate industries in Hawaii remain weak.  Hawaii’s seasonally adjusted unemployment rate improved slightly from June 30, 2009 to 7.2% as of September 30, 2009.  The slow economy in Hawaii is resulting in higher delinquencies and loss rates in our loan and lease portfolio, with the primary impact in our commercial and industrial, construction, and mortgage-related consumer lending portfolios.  Table 14 presents several segments of our loan and lease portfolio which demonstrate a higher risk profile.	 	Residential home building loans represent $85.4 million or 62% of our total commercial construction portfolio balance as of September 30, 2009.  Higher risk exposure in our residential home building portfolio was $38.6 million as of September 30, 2009, of which $10.3 million was included in non-performing assets.  As of September 30, 2009, $16.5 million of this higher risk exposure relates to residential development projects outside of Oahu.  The increase in our higher risk exposure from June 30, 2009 was primarily due to a regional home builder with operations on Oahu who is largely experiencing difficulties in other markets.
 
Land loans in our residential mortgage portfolio often represents higher risk due to the volatility in the value of the underlying collateral.  Our Hawaii residential land loan portfolio was $43.1 million as of September 30, 2009, of which $36.6 million related to properties on Hawaiian islands other than Oahu.	
 
Higher Risk Loans Outstanding	 	Table 14	 	
 	 	September 30,	 	June 30,	 	March 31,	 	December 31,	 	September 30,	 	
(dollars in thousands)	 	2009	 	2009	 	2009	 	2008	 	2008	 	
Residential Home Building	 	$	38,592	 	$	22,850	 	$	8,536	 	$	5,001	 	$	6,944	 	
Residential Land Loans	 	43,128	 	47,871	 	50,663	 	54,483	 	58,401	 	
Home Equity Loans	 	24,339	 	21,832	 	19,431	 	14,917	 	14,028	 	
Air Transportation	 	60,996	 	62,148	 	76,303	 	79,692	 	79,758	 	

The higher risk segment within our Hawaii home equity lending portfolio was $24.3 million or 3% of our total home equity loans outstanding as of September 30, 2009.  The higher risk segment within our Hawaii home equity portfolio was those loans originated in 2005 or later, with current monitoring credit scores below 600, and with current loan-to-value (“LTV”) ratios greater than 70%.
 
We also continue to have elevated risk in our air transportation portfolio due to a weaker economy in Hawaii and the U.S. Mainland.  As of September 30, 2009, included in our commercial leasing portfolio were eight leveraged leases on aircraft that were originated in the 1990’s and prior. Outstanding credit exposure related to these leveraged leases was $52.9 million as of September 30, 2009 and $71.0 million as of December 31, 2008. The decrease in our air transportation credit exposure as of September 30, 2009 compared to December 31, 2008 was primarily due to the sale of our equity interest in a cargo aircraft in the second quarter of 2009.	 	See Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for more information on this transaction.  As of September 30, 2009, we also had an $8.1 million exposure related to one direct financing lease for an aircraft, whose intermediary and guarantor has disclosed that it will not receive additional financial support from the U.S. government and that it could file for bankruptcy protection.  Relative to our total loan and lease portfolio, domestic air transportation carriers continue to demonstrate a higher risk profile due to fuel costs, pension plan obligations, consumer demand, and marginal pricing power. We believe that volatile fuel costs, coupled with a weak U.S. Mainland economy, will place additional pressure on the financial health of air transportation carriers for the foreseeable future.
 
These higher risk loans and leases have been considered in our quarterly evaluation of the adequacy of the Allowance.

43

Table of Contents
 
Non-Performing Assets
 
Table 15 presents information on non-performing assets (“NPA”) and accruing loans and leases past due 90 days or more.
 
Non-Performing Assets and Accruing Loans and Leases Past Due 90 Days or More	 	 	 	Table 15	 	
 	 	September 30,	 	June 30,	 	March 31,	 	December 31,	 	September 30,	 	
(dollars in thousands)	 	2009	 	2009	 	2009	 	2008	 	2008	 	
Non-Performing Assets1	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Non-Accrual Loans and Leases	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Commercial	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Commercial and Industrial	 	$	9,924	 	$	10,511	 	$	21,839	 	$	3,869	 	$	574	 	
Commercial Mortgage	 	1,193	 	1,219	 	—	 	—	 	—	 	
Construction	 	15,534	 	6,548	 	5,001	 	5,001	 	—	 	
Lease Financing	 	690	 	956	 	910	 	133	 	149	 	
Total Commercial	 	27,341	 	19,234	 	27,750	 	9,003	 	723	 	
Consumer	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Residential Mortgage	 	16,718	 	16,265	 	9,230	 	3,904	 	3,749	 	
Home Equity	 	3,726	 	2,567	 	1,620	 	1,614	 	1,162	 	
Other2	 	550	 	550	 	1,383	 	—	 	—	 	
Total Consumer	 	20,994	 	19,382	 	12,233	 	5,518	 	4,911	 	
Total Non-Accrual Loans and Leases	 	48,335	 	38,616	 	39,983	 	14,521	 	5,634	 	
Foreclosed Real Estate	 	201	 	438	 	346	 	428	 	293	 	
Total Non-Performing Assets	 	$	48,536	 	$	39,054	 	$	40,329	 	$	14,949	 	$	5,927	 	
Accruing Loans and Leases Past Due 90 Days or More	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Commercial	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Commercial and Industrial	 	$	137	 	$	13	 	$	—	 	$	6,785	 	$	—	 	
Construction	 	3,005	 	—	 	—	 	—	 	—	 	
Lease Financing	 	—	 	—	 	257	 	268	 	—	 	
Total Commercial	 	3,142	 	13	 	257	 	7,053	 	—	 	
Consumer	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Residential Mortgage	 	5,951	 	4,657	 	4,794	 	4,192	 	3,455	 	
Home Equity	 	1,698	 	2,879	 	1,720	 	1,077	 	296	 	
Automobile	 	749	 	769	 	776	 	743	 	758	 	
Other2	 	739	 	1,270	 	1,100	 	1,134	 	926	 	
Total Consumer	 	9,137	 	9,575	 	8,390	 	7,146	 	5,435	 	
Total Accruing Loans and Leases Past Due 90 Days or More	 	$	12,279	 	$	9,588	 	$	8,647	 	$	14,199	 	$	5,435	 	
Restructured Loans Not Included in Non-Accrual Loans and Accruing Loans Past Due 90 Days or More	 	$	7,578	 	$	2,307	 	$	—	 	$	—	 	$	—	 	
Total Loans and Leases	 	$	5,931,358	 	$	6,149,911	 	$	6,338,726	 	$	6,530,233	 	$	6,539,458	 	
Ratio of Non-Accrual Loans and Leases to
Total Loans and Leases	 	0.81	%	0.63	%	0.63	%	0.22	%	0.09	%	
Ratio of Non-Performing Assets to
Total Loans and Leases and Foreclosed Real Estate	 	0.82	%	0.63	%	0.64	%	0.23	%	0.09	%	
Ratio of Commercial Non-Performing Assets to
Total Commercial Loans and Leases	 	1.23	%	0.83	%	1.19	%	0.37	%	0.03	%	
Ratio of Consumer Non-Performing Assets to
Total Consumer Loans and Leases
and Foreclosed Real Estate	 	0.57	%	0.52	%	0.31	%	0.14	%	0.13	%	
Ratio of Non-Performing Assets and Accruing Loans and Leases Past Due 90 Days or More to Total Loans and Leases and Foreclosed Real Estate	 	1.03	%	0.79	%	0.77	%	0.45	%	0.17	%	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Quarter to Quarter Changes in Non-Performing Assets 1	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Balance at Beginning of Quarter	 	$	39,054	 	$	40,329	 	$	14,949	 	$	5,927	 	$	6,680	 	
Additions	 	22,856	 	22,459	 	29,164	 	15,464	 	1,355	 	
Reductions	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Payments	 	(6,899	)	(15,593	)	(874	)	(2,440	)	(955	)	
Return to Accrual Status	 	(3,373	)	(230	)	(768	)	(1,468	)	(756	)	
Sales of Foreclosed Real Estate	 	(237	)	—	 	(82	)	—	 	—	 	
Charge-offs/Write-downs	 	(2,865	)	(7,911	)	(2,060	)	(2,534	)	(397	)	
Total Reductions	 	(13,374	)	(23,734	)	(3,784	)	(6,442	)	(2,108	)	
Balance at End of Quarter	 	$	48,536	 	$	39,054	 	$	40,329	 	$	14,949	 	$	5,927	 	
 
1	Excluded from non-performing assets are non-accrual loans held for sale of $7.7 million and $5.2 million as of September 30, 2009 and June 30, 2009, respectively.	
2	Comprised of other revolving credit, installment, and lease financing.	
 
44

Table of Contents
 
NPAs are comprised of non-accrual loans and leases and foreclosed real estate. The $33.6 million increase in NPAs from December 31, 2008 was primarily due to net additions to non-accrual status of $12.8 million in residential mortgage loans, $10.5 million in construction loans, and $6.1 million in commercial and industrial loans.
 
The increase in non-accrual residential mortgage loans from December 31, 2008 was primarily due to a $6.2 million increase in non-accrual land loans and second home and investment properties on Hawaiian Islands other than Oahu.  Also contributing to this increase was a $4.2 million increase in non-accrual owner-occupied properties on Hawaiian Islands other than Oahu.  Non-accrual residential mortgage loans on Oahu increased by $2.2 million from December 31, 2008.  As of September 30, 2009, there were 84 properties on non-accrual status, compared to 32 properties on non-accrual status as of December 31, 2008.
 
The increase in non-accrual construction loans during the third quarter of 2009 was primarily due to the addition to non-accrual status of two loans totaling $10.5 million.  Non-accrual loan exposure in our construction loan portfolio was comprised of four construction loans, with the largest exposure being $6.8 million.  We have evaluated each of these loans for impairment and have taken partial charge-offs on three of these loans.  The fourth loan is deemed to be well-secured, with a 12% LTV ratio, as it represents the senior tranche in a structured loan with a high level of subordination.
 
Included in NPAs are loans that we consider impaired.  Impaired loans are defined as those which we believe it is probable we will not collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement, as well as those loans whose terms have been modified in a troubled debt restructuring (“TDR”).   Impaired loans were $32.4 million as of September 30, 2009 and $8.3 million as of December 31,	 	2008.  There were no impaired loans as of September 30, 2008.  Impaired loans had a related Allowance of $4.1 million as of September 30, 2009 and less than $0.1 million as of December 31, 2008.
 
We had loans whose terms had been modified in a TDR of $8.4 million as of September 30, 2009.  Loans modified in a TDR were primarily the result of the modification of interest rates to below market rates and extensions of maturity dates.
 
Loans and Leases Past Due 90 Days or More and Still Accruing Interest
 
Loans and leases in this category are 90 days or more past due, as to principal or interest, and still accruing interest because they are well secured and in the process of collection.  The $1.9 million or 14% decrease in loans and leases past due 90 days or more and still accruing interest from December 31, 2008 was primarily due to the payoff of two commercial and industrial loans during the first quarter of 2009.  This was partially offset by the addition of one construction loan to this classification in the third quarter of 2009.
 
The $6.8 million increase in loans and leases past due 90 days or more and still accruing interest from September 30, 2008 reflects increased delinquency activity in our consumer loans, consistent with the weak economy in Hawaii, primarily in the portfolios that are affected by residential real estate.  As noted previously, there was an addition of one construction loan to this classification which also contributed to the increase in loans and leases past due 90 days or more from September 30, 2008. This loan has a LTV ratio of 33% and is currently in the process of collection.	
 
45

Table of Contents
 
Reserve for Credit Losses
 
Table 16 presents the activity in our reserve for credit losses.
 
Reserve for Credit Losses	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	Table 16	 	
 	 	         Three Months Ended	 	          Nine Months Ended	 	
 	 	          September 30,	 	          September 30,	 	
(dollars in thousands)	 	2009	 	2008	 	2009	 	2008	 	
Balance at Beginning of Period	 	$	142,835	 	$	107,667	 	$	128,667	 	$	96,167	 	
Loans and Leases Charged-Off	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Commercial	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Commercial and Industrial	 	(4,769	)	(1,783	)	(23,493	)	(4,568	)	
Commercial Mortgage	 	(2,092	)	—	 	(2,092	)	—	 	
Construction	 	(5,845	)	—	 	(5,845	)	—	 	
Lease Financing	 	(120	)	(27	)	(4,613	)	(303	)	
Consumer	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Residential Mortgage	 	(2,430	)	(398	)	(5,071	)	(531	)	
Home Equity	 	(3,614	)	(519	)	(9,233	)	(1,798	)	
Automobile	 	(2,602	)	(2,858	)	(7,694	)	(7,960	)	
Other1	 	(3,032	)	(3,444	)	(10,252	)	(8,202	)	
Total Loans and Leases Charged-Off	 	(24,504	)	(9,029	)	(68,293	)	(23,362	)	
Recoveries on Loans and Leases Previously Charged-Off	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Commercial	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Commercial and Industrial	 	252	 	220	 	1,022	 	1,407	 	
Lease Financing	 	49	 	2	 	81	 	7	 	
Consumer	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Residential Mortgage	 	448	 	67	 	719	 	162	 	
Home Equity	 	67	 	36	 	239	 	83	 	
Automobile	 	849	 	699	 	2,311	 	2,195	 	
Other1	 	581	 	647	 	2,004	 	2,051	 	
Total Recoveries on Loans and Leases Previously Charged-Off	 	2,246	 	1,671	 	6,376	 	5,905	 	
Net Loans and Leases Charged-Off	 	(22,258	)	(7,358	)	(61,917	)	(17,457	)	
Provision for Credit Losses	 	27,500	 	20,358	 	81,077	 	41,957	 	
Provision for Unfunded Commitments	 	—	 	—	 	250	 	—	 	
Balance at End of Period2	 	$	148,077	 	$	120,667	 	$	148,077	 	$	120,667	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Components	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses	 	$	142,658	 	$	115,498	 	$	142,658	 	$	115,498	 	
Reserve for Unfunded Commitments	 	5,419	 	5,169	 	5,419	 	5,169	 	
Total Reserve for Credit Losses	 	$	148,077	 	$	120,667	 	$	148,077	 	$	120,667	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Average Loans and Leases Outstanding	 	$	6,034,956	 	$	6,512,453	 	$	6,245,117	 	$	6,543,871	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Ratio of Net Loans and Leases Charged-Off to
Average Loans and Leases Outstanding (annualized)	 	1.46	%	0.45	%	1.33	%	0.36	%	
Ratio of Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses to
Loans and Leases Outstanding	 	2.41	%	1.77	%	2.41	%	1.77	%	
 
1	Comprised of other revolving credit, installment, and lease financing.	
2	Included in this analysis is activity related to the Company’s reserve for unfunded commitments, which is separately recorded in other liabilities in the Consolidated Statements of Condition.	
 
We maintain a Reserve that consists of two components, the Allowance and a Reserve for Unfunded Commitments (“Unfunded Reserve”).  The Reserve provides for the risk of credit losses inherent in the loan and lease portfolio and is based on loss estimates derived from a comprehensive quarterly evaluation.  The evaluation reflects analyses of individual	 	borrowers and historical loss experience, supplemented as necessary by credit judgment that considers observable trends, conditions, and other relevant environmental and economic factors.
 
The level of the Allowance is adjusted by recording an expense or recovery through the Provision.  The level of the	
 
46

Table of Contents
 
Unfunded Reserve is adjusted by recording an expense or recovery in other noninterest expense.  The Provision exceeded net charge-offs of loans and leases for the third quarter of 2009 by $5.2 million and by $19.2 million for the first nine months of 2009.
 
Commercial and industrial net charge-offs for the third quarter of 2009 included a $1.8 million partial charge-off related to the sale of our interest in a syndicated credit of $8.8 million. 
 
Commercial mortgage charge-offs of $2.1 million in the third quarter of 2009 related to a partial charge-off resulting from the sale of our interest in a syndicated credit which was in the process of closing as of September 30, 2009.  As a result, our interest in this syndicated credit was recorded in loans held for sale as of September 30, 2009 at its estimated fair value of $7.7 million.
 
Construction charge-offs of $5.8 million in the third quarter of 2009 included partial charge-offs related to three projects.  These borrowers were adversely affected by weakness in the residential real estate market and the economy in Hawaii.
 
Charge-off activity in our consumer portfolios in the third quarter of 2009 was consistent with the slow economy in Hawaii.  Although we remain focused on loss mitigation strategies, consumers continue to be adversely impacted by higher levels of unemployment, lower real estate values, and weakness in the economy in Hawaii.
 
As of September 30, 2009, the Allowance was $142.7 million or 2.41% of total loans and leases outstanding.  This represents an increase of 52 basis points from December 31, 2008 and an increase of 64 basis points from September 30, 2008.  The increase in the Allowance during the third quarter of 2009 was primarily due to increased risk in our mortgage-related consumer lending portfolios, a result of the weak economy in Hawaii.
 
Although we determine the amount of each component of the Allowance separately, the Allowance as a whole was considered appropriate by management as of September 30, 2009, based on our ongoing analysis of estimated probable credit losses, credit risk profiles, economic conditions, coverage ratios, and other relevant factors.	 	The Reserve for Unfunded Commitments
 
We increased the Unfunded Reserve by $0.3 million from December 31, 2008 and September 30, 2008.  The process used to determine the Unfunded Reserve is consistent with the process for determining the Allowance, as adjusted for estimated funding probabilities or loan and lease equivalency factors.
 
Market Risk
 
Market risk is the potential of loss arising from adverse changes in interest rates and prices.  We are exposed to market risk as a consequence of the normal course of conducting our business activities.  Our market risk management process involves measuring, monitoring, controlling, and managing risks that can significantly impact our statements of income and condition.  In this management process, market risks are balanced with expected returns in an effort to enhance earnings performance, while limiting volatility.  The activities associated with these market risks are categorized into “trading” and “other than trading.”
 
Our trading activities include foreign currency and foreign exchange contracts that expose us to a small degree of foreign currency risk.  These transactions are primarily executed on behalf of customers.  Our other than trading activities include normal business transactions that expose our balance sheet profile to varying degrees of market risk.
 
Our primary market risk exposure is interest rate risk.
 
Interest Rate Risk
 
The objective of our interest rate risk management process is to maximize net interest income while operating within acceptable limits established for interest rate risk and maintaining adequate levels of funding and liquidity.
 
The potential cash flows, sales, or replacement value of many of our assets and liabilities, especially those that earn or pay interest, are sensitive to changes in the general level of interest rates.  This interest rate risk arises primarily from our normal	
 
47

Table of Contents
 
business activities of gathering deposits and extending loans.  Many factors affect our exposure to changes in interest rates, such as general economic and financial conditions, customer preferences, historical pricing relationships, and repricing characteristics of financial instruments.
 
Our earnings are affected not only by general economic conditions, but also by the monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government and its agencies, particularly the FRB.  The monetary policies of the FRB influence, to a significant extent, the overall growth of loans, investment securities, and deposits and the level of interest rates earned on assets and paid for liabilities.  The nature and impact of future changes in monetary policies are generally not predictable.
 
In managing interest rate risk, we, through the Asset/Liability Management Committee (“ALCO”), measure short and long-term sensitivities to changes in interest rates.  The ALCO utilizes several techniques to manage interest rate risk, which include:
 
·                 adjusting balance sheet mix or altering the interest rate characteristics of assets and liabilities;
·                 changing product pricing strategies;
·                 modifying characteristics of the investment securities portfolio; or
·                 using derivative financial instruments.
 
The use of derivative financial instruments has generally been limited.  This is due to natural on-balance sheet hedges arising out of offsetting interest rate exposures from loans and investment securities with deposits and other interest-bearing liabilities.  In particular, the investment securities portfolio is utilized to manage the interest rate exposure and sensitivity to within the guidelines and limits established by ALCO.  Natural and offsetting hedges reduce the need to employ off-balance sheet derivative financial instruments to hedge interest rate risk exposures.  Expected movements in interest rates are also	 	considered in managing interest rate risk.  Thus, as interest rates change, we may use different techniques to manage interest rate risk.
 
A key element in our ongoing process to measure and monitor interest rate risk is the utilization of an asset/liability simulation model.  The model is used to estimate and measure the balance sheet sensitivity to changes in interest rates.  These estimates are based on assumptions on the behavior of loan and deposit pricing, repayment rates on mortgage-based assets, and principal amortization and maturities on other financial instruments.  The model’s analytics include the effects of standard prepayment options on mortgages and customer withdrawal options for deposits.  While such assumptions are inherently uncertain, we believe that these assumptions are reasonable.  As a result, the simulation model attempts to capture the dynamic nature of the balance sheet.
 
We utilize net interest income simulations to analyze short-term income sensitivities to changes in interest rates.  Table 17 presents, as of September 30, 2009 and 2008, an estimate of the change in net interest income during a quarterly time frame that would result from a gradual change in interest rates, moving in a parallel fashion over the entire yield curve, over the next 12-month period, relative to the measured base case scenario.  The base case scenario assumes the balance sheet and interest rates are generally unchanged.  Based on the net interest income simulation as of September 30, 2009, net interest income sensitivity to changes in interest rates as of September 30, 2009 was slightly more sensitive compared to the sensitivity profiles as of September 30, 2008.  Economic conditions and government intervention have caused interest rates to fall to low levels and introduced significant market volatility.  These factors have contributed to greater interest rate risk to the Company as of September 30, 2009.

48

Table of Contents
 
Net Interest Income Sensitivity Profile	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	Table 17  	
 	 	Impact on Future Quarterly Net Interest Income	 	
(dollars in thousands)	 	September 30, 2009	 	September 30, 2008	 	
Change in Interest Rates (basis points)	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
+200	 	$	(723	)	(0.7	)%	$	(627	)	(0.6	)%	
+100	 	(206	)	(0.2	)	(104	)	(0.1	)	
-100	 	(1,135	)	(1.1	)	(940	)	(0.9	)	
-200	 	(2,477	)	(2.4	)	(2,090	)	(2.0	)	

To analyze the impact of changes in interest rates in a more realistic manner, non-parallel interest rate scenarios are also simulated.  These non-parallel interest rate scenarios indicate that net interest income may decrease from the base case scenario should the yield curve flatten or become inverted for a period of time.  Conversely, if the yield curve should steepen further from its mostly “normal” profile, net interest income may increase.  We also use the Market Value of Portfolio Equity (“MVPE”) sensitivity analysis to estimate the net present value change in our net assets (i.e., assets, liabilities, and off-balance sheet instruments) from changes in interest rates.  The MVPE was approximately $2.0 billion as of
September 30, 2009 and approximately $1.6 billion as of September 30, 2008.  Table 18 presents, as of September 30, 2009 and 2008, an estimate of the change in the MVPE that would occur from an instantaneous 100 and 200 basis point increase or decrease in interest rates, moving in a parallel fashion over the entire yield curve.  The MVPE sensitivity generally decreased as of September 30, 2009 compared to September 30, 2008 as a result of changes in the balance sheet, particularly from higher deposit balances.  A further significant parallel decline in interest rates effectively creates a 0% interest rate environment which greatly reduces the estimated value of both our loans and deposits.

Market Value of Equity Sensitivity Profile	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	Table 18  	
 	 	Change in Market Value of Equity	 	
(dollars in thousands)	 	September 30, 2009	 	September 30, 2008	 	
Change in Interest Rates (basis points)	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
+200	 	$	(45,976	)	(2.3	)%	$	(196,695	)	(12.5	)%	
+100	 	13,149	 	0.7	 	(83,651	)	(5.3	)	
-100	 	(30,625	)	(1.6	)	(5,721	)	(0.4	)	
-200	 	(121,051	)	(6.1	)	(130,480	)	(8.3	)	

Further enhancing the MVPE sensitivity analysis are:
 
·                 value-at-risk metrics;
·                 key rate analysis;
·                 duration of equity analysis; and
·                 exposure to basis risk and non-parallel yield curve shifts.
 
There are inherent limitations to these measures; however, used along with the MVPE sensitivity analysis, we obtain better overall insight for managing our exposures to changes in interest rates.  Based on the additional analyses, we estimate that our greatest exposure is in scenarios where interest rates fall significantly from current levels.
Liquidity Management
 
Liquidity is managed in an effort to provide continuous access to sufficient, reasonably priced funds.  Funding requirements are impacted by loan originations and refinancings, liability issuances and settlements, and off-balance sheet funding commitments.  We consider and comply with various regulatory guidelines regarding required liquidity levels and periodically monitor our liquidity position in light of the changing economic environment and customer activity.  Based on periodic liquidity assessments, we may alter our asset,

49

Table of Contents

liability, and off-balance sheet positions.  The ALCO monitors sources and uses of funds and modifies asset and liability positions as liquidity requirements change.  This process, combined with our ability to raise funds in money and capital markets and through private placements, provides flexibility in managing the exposure to liquidity risk.
 
In an effort to satisfy our liquidity needs, we actively manage our assets and liabilities.  The potential sources of short-term liquidity include interest-bearing deposits as well as the ability to sell certain assets including investment securities available-for-sale.  Assets generate long-term liquidity through cash flows from investment securities and loans.  With respect to liabilities, short-term liquidity is generated from securities sold under agreements to repurchase and other short-term funding sources such as federal funds while long-term liquidity is generated through growth in deposits and long-term debt.
 
We strengthened our liquidity position in the third quarter of 2009, with increased levels of funding.  Total deposits were $9.3 billion as of September 30, 2009, a $958.0 million or 12% increase from December 31, 2008, and a $1.6 billion or 21% increase from September 30, 2008.  In 2009, we made investments in debt securities issued by the U.S. Treasury and in mortgage-backed securities issued by government agencies.  These investments in high grade securities with relatively short durations, allows us to maintain flexibility to redeploy funds should such opportunities arise.
 
Capital Management
 
The Company and the Bank are subject to regulatory capital requirements administered by the federal banking agencies.  Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can cause certain mandatory and discretionary actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a material effect on our financial statements.  Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, the
Company and the Bank must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative and qualitative measures.  These measures were established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy.  As of September 30, 2009, the Company and the Bank were “well capitalized” under this regulatory framework.  There have been no conditions or events since September 30, 2009 that management believes have changed either the Company’s or the Bank’s capital classifications.
 
As of September 30, 2009, our shareholders’ equity was $902.8 million, a $112.1 million or 14% increase from December 31, 2008, and a $122.8 million or 16% increase from September 30, 2008.
 
In response to a slowing economy and economic uncertainty, we began in the second half of 2008 to increase capital.  As of September 30, 2009, our Tier 1 capital ratio was 13.43%, our total capital ratio was 14.70%, our leverage ratio was 6.67%, and our ratio of tangible common equity to risk-weighted assets was 14.56%.
 
From the beginning of our share repurchase program in July 2001 through October 28, 2008, we repurchased a total of 45.6 million shares of common stock and returned $1.6 billion to our shareholders at an average cost of $35.44 per share.  We have not repurchased shares of our common stock since October 2008, except for purchases from our employees in connection with income tax withholdings related to the vesting of restricted stock and shares purchased for our Rabbi Trust.  Total share repurchase authority under our share repurchase program was $1.70 billion as of October 21, 2009.  Remaining buyback authority under our share repurchase program was $85.4 million as of October 21, 2009.
 
In October 2009, our Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.45 per share on our outstanding shares.  The dividend will be payable on December 14, 2009 to our shareholders of record at the close of business on November 30, 2009.

50

Table of Contents
 
Table 19 presents our regulatory capital and ratios as of September 30, 2009, December 31, 2008, and September 30, 2008.
 
Regulatory Capital and Ratios	 	 	 	 	 	Table 19	 	
 	 	September 30,	 	December 31,	 	September 30,	 	
(dollars in thousands)	 	2009	 	2008	 	2008	 	
Regulatory Capital	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Shareholders’ Equity	 	$	902,799	 	$	790,704	 	$	780,020	 	
Less:	Cumulative Change in Fair Value of Financial Liabilities
Accounted for Under the Fair Value Option	 	(2,565	)	(683	)	(1,428	)	
 	Goodwill	 	34,959	 	34,959	 	34,959	 	
 	Postretirement Benefit Liability Adjustments	 	6,748	 	7,079	 	8,274	 	
 	Unrealized Valuation and Other Adjustments	 	60,845	 	(4,276	)	(15,086	)	
 	Other Assets	 	2,544	 	2,106	 	2,771	 	
Tier 1 Capital	 	800,268	 	751,519	 	750,530	 	
Allowable Reserve for Credit Losses	 	75,393	 	84,163	 	84,663	 	
Total Regulatory Capital	 	$	875,661	 	$	835,682	 	$	835,193	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Risk-Weighted Assets	 	$	5,958,763	 	$	6,688,530	 	$	6,737,044	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Key Regulatory Capital Ratios	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Tier 1 Capital Ratio	 	13.43	%	11.24	%	11.14	%	
Total Capital Ratio	 	14.70	 	12.49	 	12.40	 	
Leverage Ratio	 	6.67	 	7.30	 	7.27	 	

The revisions to our Regulatory Capital Ratios as of September 30, 2008 did not change our well capitalized position as defined in the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action.
 
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements, Credit Commitments, and Contractual Obligations
 
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
 
We do not participate in transactions that generate relationships with unconsolidated entities or financial partnerships, such as entities often referred to as variable-
interest entities, which would have been established for the purpose of facilitating off-balance sheet arrangements.
 
Contractual Obligations
 
Our contractual obligations have not changed materially since previously reported in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.
 
Credit Commitments
 
Table 20 presents our credit commitments as of September 30, 2009.

Credit Commitments	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	Table 20	 	
 	 	Less Than	 	 	 	 	 	After 5	 	 	 	
(dollars in thousands)	 	One Year	 	1-3 Years	 	4-5 Years	 	Years	 	Total	 	
Unfunded Commitments to Extend Credit	 	$	548,672	 	$	377,362	 	$	63,390	 	$	1,073,991	 	$	2,063,415	 	
Standby Letters of Credit	 	82,164	 	3,363	 	—	 	—	 	85,527	 	
Commercial Letters of Credit	 	24,677	 	—	 	—	 	—	 	24,677	 	
Total Credit Commitments	 	$	655,513	 	$	380,725	 	$	63,390	 	$	1,073,991	 	$	2,173,619	 	
 
51

Table of Contents
 
Item 3.            Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
 
See the “Market Risk” section of MD&A.
 
Item 4.            Controls and Procedures
 
The Company’s management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)) as of September 30, 2009.  Based on this evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of September 30, 2009.  There were no changes in the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that occurred during the third quarter of 2009 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

Part II - Other Information
 
Item 1A.         Risk Factors
 
There are no material changes from the risk factors set forth under Part 1, Item 1A. “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.
 
Item 2.            Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
 
The Parent’s repurchases of equity securities for the third quarter of 2009 were as follows:
 
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities	 	 	 	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	Total Number of Shares	 	Approximate Dollar Value	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	Purchased as Part of	 	of Shares that May Yet Be	 	
 	 	Total Number of	 	Average Price	 	Publicly Announced Plans	 	Purchased Under the	 	
Period	 	Shares Purchased1	 	Paid Per Share	 	or Programs	 	Plans or Programs2	 	
July 1 – 31, 2009	 	647	 	$	39.29	 	—	 	$	85,356,214	 	
August 1 – 31, 2009	 	86	 	34.74	 	—	 	85,356,214	 	
September 1 – 30, 2009	 	72	 	41.35	 	—	 	85,356,214	 	
Total	 	805	 	$	38.99	 	—	 	 	 	

1	The shares purchased in the third quarter of 2009 were shares purchased for our Rabbi Trust.  These shares were not purchased as part of the publicly announced program.  The shares were purchased at the closing price of the Parent’s common stock on the dates of purchase.	
2	The share repurchase program was first announced in July 2001.  As of September 30, 2009, $85.4 million remained of the total $1.70 billion total repurchase amount authorized by the Parent’s Board of Directors under the share repurchase program.  The program has no set expiration or termination date.	
 
Item 6.                                  Exhibits
 
A list of exhibits to this Form 10-Q is set forth on the Exhibit Index and is incorporated herein by reference.
 
52

Table of Contents
 
Signatures
 
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

Date:   October 26, 2009	 	Bank of Hawaii Corporation	

 	By:	/s/ Allan R. Landon	
 	 	Allan R. Landon	
 	 	Chairman of the Board and	
 	 	Chief Executive Officer	

 	By:	/s/ Kent T. Lucien	
 	 	Kent T. Lucien	
 	 	Chief Financial Officer	
 
53

Table of Contents
 
Exhibit Index
 
Exhibit Number	 	 	
 	 	 	
12	 	Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges	
 	 	 	
31.1	 	Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) Under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934	
 	 	 	
31.2	 	Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) Under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934	
 	 	 	
32	 	Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002	

Exhibit 12
 
Bank of Hawaii Corporation and Subsidiaries
Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
 
 	 	 	Nine Months Ended	 	
 	 	 	September 30,	 	
(dollars in thousands)	 	2009	 	2008	 	
Earnings:	 	 	 	 	 	
Income Before Provision for Income Taxes	 	$	153,216	 	$	210,532	 	
Add:	Fixed Charges Including Interest on Deposits	 	67,518	 	102,992	 	
 	Interest on Uncertain Tax Positions	 	—	 	(5,700	)	
Total Earnings Including Fixed Charges and Interest on Deposits	 	 	 	 	 	
 	and Interest on Uncertain Tax Positions	 	220,734	 	307,824	 	
Less:	Interest on Deposits	 	43,741	 	65,439	 	
 	Interest on Uncertain Tax Positions	 	—	 	(5,700	)	
Total Earnings Excluding Interest on Deposits	 	$	176,993	 	$	248,085	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	
Fixed Charges:	 	 	 	 	 	
Fixed Charges Including Interest on Deposits	 	$	67,518	 	$	102,992	 	
Add:	Interest on Uncertain Tax Positions	 	—	 	(5,700	)	
Total Fixed Charges Including Interest on Deposits	 	 	 	 	 	
 	and Interest on Uncertain Tax Positions	 	67,518	 	97,292	 	
Less:	Interest on Deposits	 	43,741	 	65,439	 	
 	Interest on Uncertain Tax Positions	 	—	 	(5,700	)	
Total Fixed Charges Excluding Interest on Deposits	 	$	23,777	 	$	37,553	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	
Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges:	 	 	 	 	 	
Including Interest on Deposits and Interest on Uncertain Tax Positions	 	3.3	x	3.2	x	
Excluding Interest on Deposits and Interest on Uncertain Tax Positions	 	7.4	x	6.6	x	

Exhibit 31.1
 
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)
Under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 
I, Allan R. Landon, certify that:
 
1.             I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Bank of Hawaii Corporation;
 
2.             Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
 
3.             Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
 
4.             The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
 
a)             Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 
b)            Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
 
c)             Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 
d)            Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
 
5.             The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors:
 
a)             All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 
b)            Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
 
Date:  October 26, 2009
 	/s/ Allan R. Landon	
 	Allan R. Landon	
 	Chairman of the Board and	
 	Chief Executive Officer	

Exhibit 31.2
 
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)
Under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 
I, Kent T. Lucien, certify that:
 
1.             I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Bank of Hawaii Corporation;
 
2.             Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
 
3.             Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
 
4.             The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
 
a)             Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 
b)            Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
 
c)             Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 
d)            Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
 
5.             The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors:
 
a)             All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 
b)            Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
 
Date:  October 26, 2009
 	/s/ Kent T. Lucien	
 	Kent T. Lucien	
 	Chief Financial Officer	

Exhibit 32
 
Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
We hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Form 10-Q of Bank of Hawaii Corporation for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2009 (the “Periodic Report”):
 
·                 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
·                 the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Bank of Hawaii Corporation for the dates and periods covered by the Periodic Report.

Date:  October 26, 2009

 	/s/ Allan R. Landon	
 	Allan R. Landon	
 	Chairman of the Board and	
 	Chief Executive Officer	

 	/s/ Kent T. Lucien	
 	Kent T. Lucien	
 	Chief Financial Officer	

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Periodic Report or as a separate disclosure document.